TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 40,138
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Andy Dipper Madely VAR for Fulham game...
Just sayin'
Just sayin'
He must have been 5.0000001cm offside, Howard Webb said so.So why didn't Bernie count against Sunderland then ?
So why didn't Bernie count against Sunderland then ?
They won't. If it was the other way around you'd hear about it.Benefit of doubt was manipulated and given to Pool
Hope Fulham makes a meal out of it
Never heard of that ever.
How do they measure the 5cm? And even more importantly how do they measure “benefit of the doubt”?
Remember they used to have that fucking green line for this and I saw it used once for rashford.Never heard of that ever.
How do they measure the 5cm? And even more importantly how do they measure “benefit of the doubt”?
Even if that’s true, you can see by the still that Wirtz has at least half a foot ahead of the Defender. Let’s assume he’s a size 8 or 9. That’s about 14 cms or 140mm.BBC making things up again...
'So, we have word as to why Florian Wirtz's goal stood...
In Europe, you’re offside to the millimeter. In the Premier League, there’s a 5cm tolerance level, or benefit of the doubt.
Surely, it should all be the same?'
Hard to say for sure if the frame Sky chooses is the correct one, since we just see the frame they chose. Not disputing the possibility for manipulation.But the frame was accurate. Same with Dias offside at Newcastle. The frame at point of action had Dias firmly planted on the floor. Yet the automated image used was from seconds earlier when he was in the air. No excusing it. It’s cheating in plain sight.
Wankers just make up what they want when it suits them. If we’d scored that it wouldn’t have been allowed for a start but if it had they’d be screaming blue murder. And we’d have weeks of media bollocks about dark arts how we get away with everything and how we look “ominous”Allegedly they're saying his foot wasn't 'planted'??? What the fuck. So you can't be offside if your foot is in the air.....? Is that a thing?
No mate. A lot of moaning on here about a Liverpool goal, but it was obviously onside as a very useful graphic showed us.Any match officials manipulation of results today?
That Liverpool goal looks clearly offside. You can it clearly by the shades of grass. VAR has cheated again.
Wankers just make up what they want when it suits them. If we’d scored that it wouldn’t have been allowed for a start but if it had they’d be screaming blue murder. And we’d have weeks of media bollocks about dark arts how we get away with everything and how we look “ominous”
Hard to say for sure if the frame Sky chooses is the correct one, since we just see the frame they chose. Not disputing the possibility for manipulation.