imrebanana
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Feb 2008
- Messages
- 1,007
Salford Tierney somewhat favouriting the team for near Salford as per.
Thought he actually stood on the ball there, although that doesn’t negate your comment!Nope, Saka is a diving little ****
I dont think you can say it was incorrectly ruled. There was contact and it was, therefore, strictly speaking a foul. However it’s the inconsistency that drives you crazy. Refs have been letting worse than that go all season and we are being told that refs are being instructed to let the game flow…. unless it leads to a goal.Rags so far this season:
Brighton: McTominay not sent off. Brighton penalty not awarded. Soft Rag goal alot of other teams would have had ruled out.
Dippers: The only team who have had a offside goal allowed due to a new rule that no one else has had applied before or after that game
Southampton: Allowed to play Basketball in the area, got away with another penalty
Today: Gaol incorrectly ruled out for Arsenal. New rules means more challenges allowed and not all are now fouls. Not a clear and obvious error. Would have stood if the other way round.
So thats in the 1st 6 games, its clear and obvious cheating for the PL brand