Premier League Games 5/6 Nov '22

[Paladin]

Lol, it's not even a foul. Sessegnon sees TAA coming, stops running, and just goes down like a leaf.

He is allowed to have a difference of opinion though. He’s not been nasty nor provocative, just put forward his thinking.

It's not a valid opinion though, because everyone can see from the side on replay that Alexander Arnold pushed him. The push is a fact, so don't say he didn't push him. A valid opinion would be that Sessegnon made a meal of it and went down too easily.

Someone might say that Milner is having a good game today. It's not a valid opinion because Milner isn't playing.

Similarly this statement that Sessegnon "stops running" is patently untrue. When posters say nonsense like this, they rightly get called out on it.

 

[DenisLawBackHeel74]

What they said?

Richard Keys asking whether spurs should have had a penalty…shows a video of the challenge a few times…McAteer says no and then explains his reasoning…..Keys asks again why not and explains that he thinks spurs have been robbed and it’s a pen….McAteer is adamant it’s ok…..they then cut to footage of the city game yesterday and Keys points out that the challenge is identical and surely if Cancelo is a red and penalty then spurs should also have had one…

Nicely done and a point well made.

 

[Ghostofmerlin]

I haven’t seen a decent angle of it yet, but that second Salah goal looked like it might be offside

 

[RobinHood]

Richard Keys asking whether spurs should have had a penalty…shows a video of the challenge a few times…McAteer says no and then explains his reasoning…..Keys asks again why not and explains that he thinks spurs have been robbed and it’s a pen….McAteer is adamant it’s ok…..they then cut to footage of the city game yesterday and Keys points out that the challenge is identical and surely if Cancelo is a red and penalty then spurs should also have had one…

Nicely done and a point well made.

McAteer's response?

 

[sincity]

What they said?

Compared the Cancelo shove yesterday that resulted in a penalty, to the shove by TAA and asked why it was not a penalty. They were talking about the inconsistency of the refereeing.

 

[Withnail]

Souness rightly saying if the ref sees that angle he'd give a penalty. Well that's supposed to be what var is for. Selective vision England sees it, calls the ref to the monitor. Only he didn't.

No consistency whatsoever, utter joke.

 

[bluemoon32]

They have the self-belief and knowledge they can do us damage, because they’ve done so in the past.
To come,
2 games vs Spurs
2 games vs Arsenal
3 points at stake in every game, but those are 12 big points up for grabs …

Easy 12 pts for us...

 

[paulchapo]

Richard Keys asking whether spurs should have had a penalty…shows a video of the challenge a few times…McAteer says no and then explains his reasoning…..Keys asks again why not and explains that he thinks spurs have been robbed and it’s a pen….McAteer is adamant it’s ok…..they then cut to footage of the city game yesterday and Keys points out that the challenge is identical and surely if Cancelo is a red and penalty then spurs should also have had one…

Nicely done and a point well made.

Yet not one peep on sky, not one.

 

[youngbob]

Corruption doesn't simply have to benefit a specific team you know (?)

So if you believe corruption to be so widespread then why do you bother watching football?

 

[Sky Blue]

McAteer's response?

Eh..