TheCentralScrutinizer
Well-Known Member
Hardly proven,he's played 20 odd games at the top levelWe have to sign Ollie Watkins, 25 years old, a proven goalscorer and way cheaper than the marquee players we are always being linked with.
Hardly proven,he's played 20 odd games at the top levelWe have to sign Ollie Watkins, 25 years old, a proven goalscorer and way cheaper than the marquee players we are always being linked with.
Because both those players are twice the player Watkins is, at least.It is, but people are talking about £100m for Haaland and double that for Mbappe.
I know, but Haaland has been performing at a high level for 2 or 3 seasons now. If it was a choice of 100m for Haaland, or 50m for Watkins, which would you go for? I know which one I'd opt for.It is, but people are talking about £100m for Haaland and double that for Mbappe.
It is, but people are talking about £100m for Haaland and double that for Mbappe.
Bloody Canadians. Should stick to beating the shit out of each other on the ice hockey, er, rink?Lol Mbappe & Haaland are proven at a higher level.
He gets fouled a lot, but he also makes the most of it a LOT.
Bit of the prancing Ron(aldo) about his reactions to fouls.
Don't really like PeakyBlinders, don't really like him either.