remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Rice is still garbage.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Premier League Games 8/9/10 October '22
- Thread starter kaz7
- Start date
asahartford1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 8,834
I am so suspect of pigmol and var that i will give their game a miss, olivar in charge, dippers that is
A good psychologist could do wonders for you ;-)
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
Don’t think they could disallow that, I’m getting used to my nurse bringing me halftime coffee and cake.
Was handball and he knew it.
The ball definitely changed direction, thought that was the whole purpose of VAR.
The lack of consistency in the Premiere League is astonishing.
.... and West Ham is one of the few teams that I want to do well, but fairs fair, that goal should never have been allowed.
The ball definitely changed direction, thought that was the whole purpose of VAR.
The lack of consistency in the Premiere League is astonishing.
.... and West Ham is one of the few teams that I want to do well, but fairs fair, that goal should never have been allowed.
asahartford1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 8,834
Don’t think they could disallow that, I’m getting used to my nurse bringing me halftime coffee and cake.
Your after more than coffee and cake.
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
Was it that obvious ? I’ve not got my glasses on and couldn’t tell.West Ham 2-1 up bit controversial goal for wast ham the ball did hit his elbow before scoring! I thought the rule was if the ball hits any part of the arm and you score it’s disallowed!?
BerkshireBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 4,078
yes that is the ruleWest Ham 2-1 up bit controversial goal for wast ham the ball did hit his elbow before scoring! I thought the rule was if the ball hits any part of the arm and you score it’s disallowed!?
It doesn't have to be an obvious mistake to rule out the goal.Was it that obvious ? I’ve not got my glasses on and couldn’t tell.
The fact they looked at it and you could see from the impact on his hand and the change of direction of the ball means the goal should have been ruled out. More obvious than that was the fact he knew he'd handled it and expected it to be disallowed.
Shocking decision... again
Perhaps we should employ Jeremy Kyle with his lie detector and ask the player pitchside... did you handle the ball.....
BTW I am only joking as I cannot stand that C**t.