citytill1die84
Well-Known Member
I'd be absolutely fuming if that was against us :( ridiculous decision it's a piss take
Because they love the outrage with it being City even if it is correct ..Can someone explain to me what significance the Cash “touch” or “attempt” has?
Surely Liverpool’s player is offside as the first pass is played, and that’s that. I don’t know what Carragher was saying about an “attempt” being the operative thing.
If a defender’s “touch” of the ball resets play, then why the whole furore with our goal when Mings touched it? Guess these things balance themselves out, don’t they Villa...
The weird angled lines said so. Who are we to doubt them?!I don’t see how Jota was offside. Tough titty though
It’s a load of bollocks they make it up,only surprise was it was chalked off,bet if similar happens tomorrow spurs rags and it’s a rag goal it’s given ..
Or they change the interpretation to suit themselves.Can someone explain to me what significance the Cash “touch” or “attempt” has?
Surely Liverpool’s player is offside as the first pass is played, and that’s that. I don’t know what Carragher was saying about an “attempt” being the operative thing.
If a defender’s “touch” of the ball resets play, then why the whole furore with our goal when Mings touched it? Guess these things balance themselves out, don’t they Villa...
There was more white lines there than at a scouse nightclubThe weird angled lines said so. Who are we to doubt them?!
Did you not watch the previous game? :-)There’s no way Villa can hold on here. No chance.
Sadly, yes and it’s my fault as I didn’t see @mat’s request until the thread was shut.Did you not watch the previous game? :-)
Spitty shouldn't be commentating full stopExactly, they'll probably compare it to the Mings one vs us but it's completely different. Mings started a new phase of play, Cash was trying to prevent the current phase.
Ultimately, Carragher shouldn't be commentating on his own team.