Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'General football forum' started by karen7, 8 Feb 2019.
think the time was what he was pissed off with and rightly so
Correct but you'd be pissed if it went against us. Usual they give a foul for any contact on a keeper.
It's like holding in the area at set pieces, there's a lack of consistency.
Certainly has a point there, the only time wasted in added time was by wolves taking a goal kick from the penalty spot, but poor defending/keeping in that last minute.
The sub Newcastle made in injury time meant added time to added time.
No problems re the time IMO , Wolves deserved at least a point in the game dominated possession dominated corners dominated shots on goal and on target and quite frankly lack of cutting edge for the last pass cost them all 3 points.
Another bung for the barcodes keeper.
More convinced that was a foul now.
Think Var would give that as a foul.
Does the match ref have to refer to VAR or does VAR blast down his earpiece "You silly bastard, that's an obvious penalty!"
Agreed, slowed down it's looks like he impeded the keeper.
Think every goal the var officialls have a look at and if they see somthing they let the referee know or the referee asks the question.