Premier League Games 9/10/11 Febuary

[cookster]

It wasn’t a foul imo.

Correct but you'd be pissed if it went against us. Usual they give a foul for any contact on a keeper.
It's like holding in the area at set pieces, there's a lack of consistency.

 

[cleavers]

If he's whining about the time, then fair enough.

Certainly has a point there, the only time wasted in added time was by wolves taking a goal kick from the penalty spot, but poor defending/keeping in that last minute.

 

[mancity1]

When FSW calms down, he'll see it wasn't a foul. If he's whining about the time, then fair enough.

The sub Newcastle made in injury time meant added time to added time.

No problems re the time IMO , Wolves deserved at least a point in the game dominated possession dominated corners dominated shots on goal and on target and quite frankly lack of cutting edge for the last pass cost them all 3 points.

 

[mat]

Another bung for the barcodes keeper.

 

[cookster]

More convinced that was a foul now.

 

[waspish]

Think Var would give that as a foul.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Think Var would give that as a foul.

Does the match ref have to refer to VAR or does VAR blast down his earpiece "You silly bastard, that's an obvious penalty!"

 

[cookster]

Think Var would give that as a foul.

Agreed, slowed down it's looks like he impeded the keeper.

 

[waspish]

Does the match ref have to refer to VAR or does VAR blast down his earpiece "You silly bastard, that's an obvious penalty!"

Think every goal the var officialls have a look at and if they see somthing they let the referee know or the referee asks the question.

 

[mancity1]

Both goals should have easily been handled by the keepers , really two howlers in truth.

Wolves keeper falling to his right well before Hayden even struck the ball and even then should have stopped the shot with ease.