TheBlueDune
Well-Known Member
I spent quite a bit of time working in the US and I'd explain it that people vote for aspirations. They vote for the one they believe can deliver the American Dream for them personally.California made up 12% of her popular vote so there isn't much relevance on that. Clintons problem was she was just edged out by the popular vote in the swing states like Florida.
The most interesting thing about Democrat voting is it generally comes as one sizeable majority in a city but then that popular vote is crowded out by cumulative Republican votes in smaller counties.
Texas is a good example, virtually all of Clintons vote there came from Houston and Dallas, but she lost most of everything left. In Florida she lost by a figure that could of been fixed by a greater turnout.
It seems to me their appeal is often limited by their failure to appeal to working class Americans which is strange given that is who the Democrats should be representing.
Maybe those other counties find it easier to swallow BS from people like Trump though... I don't know.
It doesn't matter how bad things are today for the country if they see that a candidate offers them better promises for them personally then that's who gets the vote.
Nobody wins who promises taxing the rich, because they all believe they can join the rich.
In the UK a lot more people vote for who promises a better society, not everyone but more do.