President Trump

...
MillionMilesAway said:
I can't embed the link, but this is dated at 3 hours ago, on the Secretary of War twitter:

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth

@SecWar
·
3h

Six weeks ago, Senator Mark Kelly — and five other members of Congress — released a reckless and seditious video that was clearly intended to undermine good order and military discipline. As a retired Navy Captain who is still receiving a military pension, Captain Kelly knows he is still accountable to military justice. And the Department of War — and the American people — expect justice.

Therefore, in response to Senator Mark Kelly’s seditious statements — and his pattern of reckless misconduct — the Department of War is taking administrative action against Captain Mark E. Kelly, USN (Ret). The department has initiated retirement grade determination proceedings under 10 U.S.C. § 1370(f), with reduction in his retired grade resulting in a corresponding reduction in retired pay.

To ensure this action, the Secretary of War has also issued a formal Letter of Censure, which outlines the totality of Captain (for now) Kelly’s reckless misconduct. This Censure is a necessary process step, and will be placed in Captain Kelly’s official and permanent military personnel file.

Captain Kelly has been provided notice of the basis for this action and has thirty days to submit a response. The retirement grade determination process directed by Secretary Hegseth will be completed within forty five days.

Captain Kelly’s status as a sitting United States Senator does not exempt him from accountability, and further violations could result in further action.

These actions are based on Captain Kelly's public statements from June through December 2025 in which he characterized lawful military operations as illegal and counseled members of the Armed Forces to refuse lawful orders. This conduct was seditious in nature and violated Articles 133 and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, to which Captain Kelly remains subject as a retired officer receiving pay.
Click to expand...

Kelly response:


1767640100600.jpeg
 
Blue Maverick said:
Well they can’t fly without permission, just turn them back if they want to come in and don’t allow them to take off unless going back to USA, even their pilots aren’t stupid enough to take off.
Click to expand...
Oh come on. Please tell me that is a wind up.
Trump told everyone that Venezuela was a no fly zone and every commercial airline stopped flying in that region giving the US a free run.
His satellites would ensure safe entry to any European airport they chose to fly to.
If Trump wanted to he could take Europe especialy one country at a time.
 
Blue Mist said:
Oh come on. Please tell me that is a wind up.
Trump told everyone that Venezuela was a no fly zone and every commercial airline stopped flying in that region giving the US a free run.
His satellites would ensure safe entry to any European airport they chose to fly to.
If Trump wanted to he could take Europe especialy one country at a time.
Click to expand...
I'd argue he's doing it already. Aided my Elon and Zuckerberg.

Oban/ARD in Germany/NF in France/Meloni Italy
 
Blue Mist said:
Oh come on. Please tell me that is a wind up.
Trump told everyone that Venezuela was a no fly zone and every commercial airline stopped flying in that region giving the US a free run.
His satellites would ensure safe entry to any European airport they chose to fly to.
If Trump wanted to he could take Europe especialy one country at a time.
Click to expand...
I think you underestimate the European forces, he would have to fly troops in 3000 miles, then they’d have to land and fight their way through, no way Europe stands by and let that happen, first up would be those already based in Europe.
 
Trevor Morley's Tache said:
You'll be amazed what a whiff of power does to a man's judgement.
Click to expand...
Think people are not realising how patriotic americans feel and if trump has a US army willing to turn on it's allies for the good of the US in their eyes then those allies are fucked more so as there are american troops stationed in nearly every NATO country in numbers and they could start operations within a european country at a whim.

If he continues this rhetoric the EU and Britain need to have the balls to request all US bases are closed and soldiers repatriated, as presently we have a ready made invasion force sitting waiting for a nutcase to give the order.
 
Blue Maverick said:
I think you underestimate the European forces, he would have to fly troops in 3000 miles, then they’d have to land and fight their way through, no way Europe stands by and let that happen, first up would be those already based in Europe.
Click to expand...
If he declared war on Europe then you're right but only a fool would do that.
First, manipulate Italy to cause dissent within the EU. and finance Hungary and Farage to create division.
Second, invade Greenland and cause further division within Europe as to a response
Third land x amount of troops and logistics at a European/US airfield under the guise of manoeuvres. Stage a false flag attack on said base and immediately respond taking out the leadership of that country. Ideally you choose a country that backed an armed response to a US invasion of Greenland. Those that didn't agree with a response may still not attack his forces, don't forget the e.u. is still individual countries who have their own electorate to satisfy and all have mothers who dont want dead sons.
How many strategic satalites do the US have that the e.u. currently rely on?

It would be very easy to do.

Edit: see Urban Genies post above
 
Blue Mist said:
If he declared war on Europe then you're right but only a fool would do that.
First, manipulate Italy to cause dissent within the EU. and finance Hungary and Farage to create division.
Second, invade Greenland and cause further division within Europe as to a response
Third land x amount of troops and logistics at a European/US airfield under the guise of manoeuvres. Stage a false flag attack on said base and immediately respond taking out the leadership of that country. Ideally you choose a country that backed an armed response to a US invasion of Greenland. Those that didn't agree with a response may still not attack his forces, don't forget the e.u. is still individual countries who have their own electorate to satisfy and all have mothers who dont want dead sons.
How many strategic satalites do the US have that the e.u. currently rely on?

It would be very easy to do.

Edit: see Urban Genies post above
Click to expand...
31 US bases and 18 support units across Europe

84000 troops spread across those sites
 
Last edited:
FogBlueInSanFran said:
Hey, remember when Damocles told us Trump was nothing to worry about, just a normal, run-of-the-mill GOP candidate whose policies and peccadilloes would all be forgotten about in ten years, and that all liberals and Trump-haters were overreacting?

Those were the days, eh?
Click to expand...

Right now, it feels like in a couple of years time you'll be looking back at today's Trump with nostalgia for the good old days before he really kicked off.
 
urban genie said:
31 US bases and 18 support units across Europe

84000 troops spread across those sites
Click to expand...
www.statista.com

US troops in Europe by country 2025| Statista

In 2025, there were estimated to be approximately 34,500 active-duty United States military personnel in Germany, the highest of any European country.
www.statista.com www.statista.com
Estimated according to AI to be around 100k due to exercises your figure seems way off possibly one zero too many
 
Blue Maverick said:
www.statista.com

US troops in Europe by country 2025| Statista

In 2025, there were estimated to be approximately 34,500 active-duty United States military personnel in Germany, the highest of any European country.
www.statista.com www.statista.com
Estimated according to AI to be around 100k due to exercises your figure seems way off possibly one zero too many
Click to expand...
My info wasn't from. AI as AI is full of infactual shite.

mine was from here https://www.statista.com/statistics...YHgnbE2dtUL3WhGS_B08S0U6Q9JkqJPFyNYH3_oEsZC3j

and this inforgraphic

20260105_210552.jpg

the numbers fluctuate but not by much and I gave worst case maximum numbers as that is relevent to. the subject that America could if it wanted attack a NATO ally quite easily while being able to distable other NATO countries that may kick off over it.

If the fuckwit tries to annex Greenland NATO is done as it is hamstrung to be effective
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top