Im certain whatever upheaval is occuring isnt a function of purposeful sabotage. I couldn't say the same of the last admin.
Laughable first sentence, only bested by a ridiculous second.
You’re on a roll today!!!
Im certain whatever upheaval is occuring isnt a function of purposeful sabotage. I couldn't say the same of the last admin.
But they’re both occurring, at the same time, albeit often at different location, hence the conflation.Vandalism is not a boycott.
As to your question, it has a false premise. I am not happy or sad. But im okay with it. Im certain whatever upheaval is occuring isnt a function of purposeful sabotage. I couldn't say the same of the last admin.
Yes but Biden and Harris makes it all okay, it’s all so much better now.So you're ok with continuing to threaten Greenland? Canada?
You're ok with President Shitgibbons plans to forcibly relocate Palestinians from Gaza in order to build Arabian Disney?
You're ok with withholding intelligence from Ukraine at the cost of civilian lives?
You're ok with putting russia first in negotiations where they are the aggressor?
You're ok with lying about Zelensky being a dictator and Ukraine starting the war?
You're ok with stopping USAid putting potentially millions of the poorest people on earth in danger of starvation or sickness?
You're ok with the White House becoming the backdrop for an advertising campaign for electric vehicles, despite the apparent fact that there is no such need for electric vehicles as the climate is fine thank you very much?
You're ok with applying sanctions then withdrawing them less than 24 hours later, despite the instability this brings to global markets and the billions of people whose investments, pensions and livelihood are affected?
You're ok with the actions of americas president towards its NATO partners, you remember, those partners who stood by america and went to war alongside them the only time article 5 has been triggered, actions that have called into question the very existence of NATO and the security to Western Europe that alliance brings?
and finally, and most importantly to the people of america, you're ok that the price of eggs is still rising?
I don't know how you sleep at night supporting the mango shitgibbon
Which is fine, but only one is illegal.But they’re both occurring, at the same time, albeit often at different location, hence the conflation.
And it’s not the one Trump said it was. 50/50 chance and he still got the wrong answer.Which is fine, but only one is illegal.
Well, with all the federal employees sacked, there's thousands of suspects.The 'not buying ' isnt the 'illegal boycott '. Its the vandalizing Tesla stores. The burning of recharge stations. The throwing of Molotov cocktails into show rooms, the shooting up of show rooms, the pelting and keying swastikas on random Tesla's you see on the street and the attacking of people driving Teslas. . etc.
I think that's what describes the illegal protests. But im sure all this has been discussed here and condemned vociferously ;)
Oh wait, it hasn't? Im shocked!!!
Carry on
I don't know how you sleep at night supporting the mango shitgibbon
Wow. If anything sums up The Orange Shit Gibbons presidency and the intelligence of those that support him.....So you're ok with continuing to threaten Greenland? Canada?
You're ok with President Shitgibbons plans to forcibly relocate Palestinians from Gaza in order to build Arabian Disney?
You're ok with withholding intelligence from Ukraine at the cost of civilian lives?
You're ok with putting russia first in negotiations where they are the aggressor?
You're ok with lying about Zelensky being a dictator and Ukraine starting the war?
You're ok with stopping USAid putting potentially millions of the poorest people on earth in danger of starvation or sickness?
You're ok with the White House becoming the backdrop for an advertising campaign for electric vehicles, despite the apparent fact that there is no such need for electric vehicles as the climate is fine thank you very much?
You're ok with applying sanctions then withdrawing them less than 24 hours later, despite the instability this brings to global markets and the billions of people whose investments, pensions and livelihood are affected?
You're ok with the actions of americas president towards its NATO partners, you remember, those partners who stood by america and went to war alongside them the only time article 5 has been triggered, actions that have called into question the very existence of NATO and the security to Western Europe that alliance brings?
and finally, and most importantly to the people of america, you're ok that the price of eggs is still rising?
I don't know how you sleep at night supporting the mango shitgibbon
That depends on where you are and if you have a permit, but, in general, I’d agree.Which is fine, but only one is illegal.
I'm not in favour of people keying people's cars or burning showrooms, but I also hate the hyperbole of saying that putting a funny sticker on someone's car is 'criminal damage.' It's like those people who shout that they're being assaulted because someone lightly touched them during an argument.That depends on where you are and if you have a permit, but, in general, I’d agree.
I’m all in favor of protest, but against violence. Sadly, one often begets the other.
Was Secession a protest?That depends on where you are and if you have a permit, but, in general, I’d agree.
I’m all in favor of protest, but against violence. Sadly, one often begets the other.
You think the Biden administration were involved in deliberate sabotage? Could you quantify that?Burning other people's property isnt free speech.
Why do some struggle so much to understand this.
As to your question, it has a false premise. I am not happy or sad. But im okay with it. Im certain whatever upheaval is occuring isnt a function of purposeful sabotage. I couldn't say the same of the last admin.
Sorry, but “putting a funny sticker on someone’s car” is property damage. Property damage is a criminal offense. Ergo, it’s criminal damage.I'm not in favour of people keying people's cars or burning showrooms, but I also hate the hyperbole of saying that putting a funny sticker on someone's car is 'criminal damage.' It's like those people who shout that they're being assaulted because someone lightly touched them during an argument.
Boycotting isn’t a physical protest either.That depends on where you are and if you have a permit, but, in general, I’d agree.
I’m all in favor of protest, but against violence. Sadly, one often begets the other.
Sorry, but “putting a funny sticker on someone’s car” is property damage. Property damage is a criminal offense. Ergo, it’s criminal damage.
The mentality I don’t understand is “Why does anyone think it’s OK to mess with other people’s property?”
It isn’t!
While I agree, there are degrees of offense, that’s what the courts are for.
Don’t touch me or my stuff and I won’t touch you and your stuff. Simple.
Now, once you cross that line, who gets to determine degrees? Not much, too much? Not hard, too hard?

Completely agree. I would have no way of knowing if people were boycotting Tesla by not buying one unless the sales data were not so damning, just as I wouldn’t know Tesla dealers were being physically protested or vandalized if it hadn’t been on the news.Boycotting isn’t a physical protest either.
99.9% of people not buying Tesla’s out of principle are not leaving their houses to protest.
As ever, you have the extremist, anarchic types that want to blow shit up, but they are in the vast minority.
Again, that’s a matter for the courts, if the police allow it to go that route, but I’m not even sure Judge Judy would send someone to jail for that?!View attachment 149592
You can’t even write clean me on a dirty car without going to jail these days…