President Trump

Which must be a factor for those not having one.

It's probably more the fact that they neither have desire or the finances to travel internationally, even without the additional $165 for a passport. A lot of them might even struggle with the required documents to obtain a passport even if they wanted one.

Either way you look at it, the current administration know that this will negatively impact voter turn out in their favour, and however you dress it up is't voter suppression against women.
 
Absolutely embarrassing that was to watch.


RFK stating that he’ll know what’s causing the rise of autism by September was especially troubling, if they were even to do this in such a short space of time what are they even going to do about it? And imagine if someone links it to the absolutely awful diet of most Americans, you reckon the likes of KFC, Pepsi, McDonalds or Coca Cola will allow it to be published?

The whole cabinet and anyone else who works for him has enabled him to get away with it all.

All are accountable.
What’s the betting they conclude measles jab causes autism?
 
A civilised nation being so stupid as to elect somebody like Trump - unthinkable.

That same nation re-electing him having seen him abuse power and make his country a laughing stock for 4 years - unthinkable.

An incumbent POTUS shamelessly - boastfully, even - manipulating the markets with seemingly no need to be subtle about it - unthinkable.

US supporting Russia, N Korea and Belarus by voting against a UN vote to condemn Moscow's actions re: Ukraine - unthinkable.

An unelected South African - generally mocked for various acts of ridiculous behaviour - being given cart-blanche access to invaluable personal data and the associated security risk - unthinkable.

That same billionaire exercising his unfathomable 'authority' to sack thousands of government employees for alleged dereliction of duty, despite some even having received excellent service awards within the previous few weeks - unthinkable.



A military coup in 21st-century USA - is that really so unthinkable?
You say unthinkable, and a decade ago all the above would have been - but certainly not unthinkable last November.

I would say every scenario you painted there was completely foreseeable six months ago, especially given the fact he openly stated what his intentions were.

Absolutely mental the daft cunts nonetheless elected him because they thought he might bring down the price of eggs.
 
Full-blown North Korea.


I watched a documentary on Idi Amin years ago. He got all his senior army officials to have a swimming race with him. Previous Generals who had beaten him had mysteriously disappeared. When you watched the race you could see all the rest holding back. Trumps golf exploits reminded me of this for some reason?
 
I watched a documentary on Idi Amin years ago. He got all his senior army officials to have a swimming race with him. Previous Generals who had beaten him had mysteriously disappeared. When you watched the race you could see all the rest holding back. Trumps golf exploits reminded me of this for some reason?
Thank God its not a swimming race. Shiver.
 
From the NYT:

Gone:
  • “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings,” Maya Angelou’s transformative best-selling 1970 memoir chronicling her struggles with racism and trauma.
  • “Memorializing the Holocaust,” Janet Jacobs’s 2010 examination of how female victims of the Holocaust have been portrayed and remembered.
Not Gone:
  • “The Camp of the Saints” by Jean Raspail (1973), which envisions a takeover of the Western world by immigrants from developing countries, has been embraced by white supremacists and promoted by Stephen Miller, a senior White House adviser.
  • “The Bell Curve,” which argues that Black men and women are genetically less intelligent than white people, is still there. But a critique of the book was pulled.
  • Two copies of “Mein Kampf” by Adolf Hitler are still on the shelves.

Where:
U.S. Naval Academy’s library, by order of Heggy's office.

“Initially, officials searched the Nimitz Library catalog, using keyword searches, to identify books that required further review, approximately 900 books were identified during the preliminary search. Departmental officials then closely examined the preliminary list to determine which books required removal to comply with directives outlined in executive orders issued by the president. This effort ultimately resulted in nearly 400 books being selected for removal from the Nimitz Library collection” (spokesperson)

Note that these aren't a required reading list, they're just books that were in the (really quite large) library.
 
So Boeing is loosing the long term maintenance contract on their planes that don't fall out of the sky - give it 12 months and American manufacturing will be decimated by China piece by piece

 
A civilised nation being so stupid as to elect somebody like Trump - unthinkable.

That same nation re-electing him having seen him abuse power and make his country a laughing stock for 4 years - unthinkable.

An incumbent POTUS shamelessly - boastfully, even - manipulating the markets with seemingly no need to be subtle about it - unthinkable.

US supporting Russia, N Korea and Belarus by voting against a UN vote to condemn Moscow's actions re: Ukraine - unthinkable.

An unelected South African - generally mocked for various acts of ridiculous behaviour - being given cart-blanche access to invaluable personal data and the associated security risk - unthinkable.

That same billionaire exercising his unfathomable 'authority' to sack thousands of government employees for alleged dereliction of duty, despite some even having received excellent service awards within the previous few weeks - unthinkable.



A military coup in 21st-century USA - is that really so unthinkable?
A coup to do away with Congress or a coup to retain democracy and exile Trump?
 
So Boeing is loosing the long term maintenance contract on their planes that don't fall out of the sky - give it 12 months and American manufacturing will be decimated by China piece by piece


This seems far-fetched and completely wrong because a 787 equivalent commercial aircraft produced by a Chinese aircraft manufacturer does not exist.

There isn't even a proven Chinese jet engine manfacturer whereas US and European engine manufacturers have been in the game for nearly 100 years.

Obviously it will come eventually but we're talking a decade or more at least and when that happens it will be a huge blow to Airbus in Europe too.
 
I watched a documentary on Idi Amin years ago. He got all his senior army officials to have a swimming race with him. Previous Generals who had beaten him had mysteriously disappeared. When you watched the race you could see all the rest holding back. Trumps golf exploits reminded me of this for some reason?
More liklely it was the stench from his uncontrolled bowel movements that made those downwind of him hold back.

He needs a brain in his arse to control his lower body movements, like a dinosaur. It needs to be present, to avoid the empty space between his ears his mother recognised as a deficiency that can't prevent him from his limted thinking abilities and shitting at the same time.
 
The only way this paragraph makes sense is if the issues we have today existed when we did have a monoculture.

When you state....

"These types of issues arise when inequality, poor policy, weak institutions, and lack of meaningful engagement allow toxic ideas to take hold in any community, not just minority ones."

That is simply not true, the worst racism I've come across is in leafy suburbia. I grew up in a terrace slum in predominantly white Salford in the 60s', it was grindingly poor, toilet out the back, no bathroom, but apart from petty theft there was no random violence or vandalism to speak of. Misogyny and wife beating existed that's for sure, but extremist groups? Toxic politics? there were none, zero, ziltch.

And you wouldn't have found the things you described in the poor communities of the Welsh valleys either.

The left view is that the "problems" are solely down to immigrant groups finding themselves in these deprived areas scrabbling for the same scarce resources as the majority poor white population, and the whites getting played to vent their resentment away from the real oppressor class, the rich, and instead onto these newcomers, but that's not how it was, and that's not how it is. If you're white working class and you haven't got a pot to piss in, only a tiny fraction of your fellow whites are going to blame the black family down the road who've just moved into the same kind of shit hole you live in.

Your post is the same patronising progressive nonsense that all nice liberal folk roll out every time, and while I consider myself a nice liberal bloke, I've realised over time that it's simply bollocks.

There are some problems that exist solely because people come from different cultural backgrounds and it has nothing to do with inequality, it has to do with multiculturalism itself, diversity is not our strength, admitting that is the case is not racism, but it is the first step in finding ways to build a more cohesive national identity that we can all buy into in order to build a happier more harmonious society

The left has a habit of wanting something to be true and then constructing a bogus oppressor/oppressed rationale to back it up, which is what you've just done. All that does is leave a gaping hole that the far right fills with hate.
The idea that the UK was peaceful and unified during its so-called monocultural past is a myth. Sectarianism, class conflict, and political extremism were widespread. Irish communities in the 60s, faced discrimination and marginalisation, causing some to sympathise with the IRA. I respect that you're speaking from personal experience, but anecdote isn’t the same as evidence. Just because some communities felt stable at the time doesn’t mean deeper tensions weren’t there. The 60s and 70s saw the rise of the National Front in white working-class areas.

Times have changed and access to extremist material is now instant and global, which makes the spread of toxic ideas far easier than it was in the 60s. The dynamics today aren’t just about who lives where they’re shaped by online radicalisation, polarised media, and digital echo chambers that didn’t exist back then.

What you’ve described as the liberal left view is actually a broader understanding of how inequality and policy failure can channel frustration away from the systems causing the harm and onto immigrant communities instead. That’s not calling people racist, it’s recognising how division is often manufactured. We've seen that dynamic repeated across media, politics, and history.

Most tensions don’t stem from diversity itself, but from how poorly it’s managed: underfunded services, lack of integration support, and political narratives that thrive on fear. Of course, there will always be exceptions, people don’t all respond the same way, and human behaviour is never uniform, but that’s exactly why we need to look at the broader patterns, not just individual experiences.

And this is exactly the kind of narrative that Trumpism thrives on, taking real frustrations and layering them with oversimplified cultural blame. It’s the same formula: suggest that diversity itself is the problem, dismiss structural issues like inequality or policy failure, and frame any attempt to explain complexity as “liberal/woke nonsense.” Trump didn’t invent this strategy but he perfected it. He turned cultural anxiety into political capital by pushing the idea that America was once strong and unified, and that everything changed when others started arriving. It’s not a solution, it’s a story. And it’s powerful because it offers easy answers to hard problems.

But if we really want a cohesive society, it won’t come from scapegoating multiculturalism. It will come from leadership that takes the hard route: acknowledging complexity, building shared values, and refusing to feed division for the sake of political gain.
 
As one who is part of a multi ethnic family, I find your ignorance and arrogance offensive. Put down the “How to be a liberal”playbook, Stop lecturing and address the issue.
You’ve said my response was ignorant and offensive, but you haven’t explained what I actually said that fits either of those labels. If there’s something specific you took issue with, I’m more than willing to engage but so far, it seems like you're reacting to being challenged.

I haven’t read How To Be a Liberal, but I’m familiar with Ian Dunt’s work and generally find him thoughtful and well informed so I might give it a go.

You moved the discussion away from the original topic, multiculturalism, national identity, and how figures like Trump exploit cultural anxiety and nostalgia to something else entirely. You’ve told me to “stop lecturing and address the issue” but I’m genuinely unsure what issue you’re referring to. I’ve read your comments several times and still can’t work out what point you’re actually trying to make.

If you'd like to try again without the tantrum and with at least one coherent thought, I’m all ears.
 
You’ve said my response was ignorant and offensive, but you haven’t explained what I actually said that fits either of those labels. If there’s something specific you took issue with, I’m more than willing to engage but so far, it seems like you're reacting to being challenged.

I haven’t read How To Be a Liberal, but I’m familiar with Ian Dunt’s work and generally find him thoughtful and well informed so I might give it a go.

You moved the discussion away from the original topic, multiculturalism, national identity, and how figures like Trump exploit cultural anxiety and nostalgia to something else entirely. You’ve told me to “stop lecturing and address the issue” but I’m genuinely unsure what issue you’re referring to. I’ve read your comments several times and still can’t work out what point you’re actually trying to make.

If you'd like to try again without the tantrum and with at least one coherent thought, I’m all ears.
No thanks. You are too arrogant for me. I prefer a discussion to a lecture.
You think your ludicrous non sequiturs are a challenge? Really? Pff.
For example, I said Prevent targeted certain groups; examine your response critically, if you can. It is ridic, not about targeting at all.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top