I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,375
Can anyone explain the difference between "acted in an unlawful manner" and "broken the law?" I've noticed everyone on the news is being very careful to not say the latter.
Nothing still carries the death penalty.I think the only law that still carries the death penalty is treason.
Could he be tried for treason? I don't know
This is way more important than who wins an election, who is PM or anything,. Today was historical because it established the rights of the legislature to hold the executive to account. That is a big win for democracy, huge win and it doesn't matter which party you support you should be delighted that our democracy is safe from being used for nefarious ends.
The justices concluded that as a result of Johnsons actions "the effect on the fundamentals of our democracy was extreme" That is coruscating.
Thank fuck, we have an independent Judiciary.
Astonishing sentence in the court's judgment :This is way more important than who wins an election, who is PM or anything,. Today was historical because it established the rights of the legislature to hold the executive to account. That is a big win for democracy, huge win and it doesn't matter which party you support you should be delighted that our democracy is safe from being used for nefarious ends.
The justices concluded that as a result of Johnsons actions "the effect on the fundamentals of our democracy was extreme" That is coruscating.
Thank fuck, we have an independent Judiciary.
Nothing still carries the death penalty.
That was high treason and that law was changed in 1998.I thought treason was still punishable by death in this country?
Under EU law that was done away with.I think the only law that still carries the death penalty is treason.
Could he be tried for treason? I don't know
It was the crime and disorder act 1998 that got rid of it.Under EU law that was done away with.