Prorogation - Judgment Day:10.30am Tuesday 24/9/19

Can anyone explain the difference between "acted in an unlawful manner" and "broken the law?" I've noticed everyone on the news is being very careful to not say the latter.
 
This is way more important than who wins an election, who is PM or anything,. Today was historical because it established the rights of the legislature to hold the executive to account. That is a big win for democracy, huge win and it doesn't matter which party you support you should be delighted that our democracy is safe from being used for nefarious ends.

The justices concluded that as a result of Johnsons actions "the effect on the fundamentals of our democracy was extreme" That is coruscating.

Thank fuck, we have an independent Judiciary.

They were testing the water, for doing it again.

No political party should ever be able to behave like this again, it's dangerous.
 
This is way more important than who wins an election, who is PM or anything,. Today was historical because it established the rights of the legislature to hold the executive to account. That is a big win for democracy, huge win and it doesn't matter which party you support you should be delighted that our democracy is safe from being used for nefarious ends.

The justices concluded that as a result of Johnsons actions "the effect on the fundamentals of our democracy was extreme" That is coruscating.

Thank fuck, we have an independent Judiciary.
Astonishing sentence in the court's judgment :

"It is impossible for us to conclude on the evidence... that there was any reason - let alone a good reason - to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament for five weeks."

Not just that the government didn't have a good reason for prorogation but it had no reason at all!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.