Rag's Repsonse To Welcome To Manchester

jayfx said:
Focusdazz said:
6014_118388041933_603786933_3105797.jpg


Thought i put this together from one of the earlier posts...Hope you like it

Change the word Manchester to Salford & its spot on mate.




stretford if you dont fuckin mind ;)

and i`ve just realised.





RAG
 
We're the pride of Manchester. (arf!) TEREZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lol!

dscn5829.jpg
 
Joycee Banercheck said:
kippax88 said:
i started a thread on this in manutdtalk

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.manutdtalk.com/forums/football-banter/24682-welcome-manchester.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.manutdtalk.com/forums/footba ... ester.html</a>

they just dont understand and most of the rags on there giving me abuse are from ireland.
I wouldn't worry about them. They're all still too busy convincing themselves that Tevez was never any good. They all still think that they are the only club to have any history and that the football league only started in 1992. They are all still too busy convincing themselves that their youth set up is bringing through some top talent when Fletcher, O'Shea and Jonny Evans are the cream of their crop. They're probably all too worried that Fletcher is probably their best midfielder right now. If they aren't, they should be. Maybe they're trying to forget that they've just sold their best player to Real Madrid, who aren't ruining football, for £80m, yet Baconface thinks that transfer fees are inflated, despite continually breaking transfer fee records on a yearly basis (before they were skint - obviously). Or maybe they're still trying to convince themselves that Owen and Valencia will fill the void left by that cheating little bastard. Maybe, and I think this is the main one, they are just a bunch of twats.

Good points, well made.
 
suvernbloo said:
Joycee Banercheck said:
I wouldn't worry about them. They're all still too busy convincing themselves that Tevez was never any good. They all still think that they are the only club to have any history and that the football league only started in 1992. They are all still too busy convincing themselves that their youth set up is bringing through some top talent when Fletcher, O'Shea and Jonny Evans are the cream of their crop. They're probably all too worried that Fletcher is probably their best midfielder right now. If they aren't, they should be. Maybe they're trying to forget that they've just sold their best player to Real Madrid, who aren't ruining football, for £80m, yet Baconface thinks that transfer fees are inflated, despite continually breaking transfer fee records on a yearly basis (before they were skint - obviously). Or maybe they're still trying to convince themselves that Owen and Valencia will fill the void left by that cheating little bastard. Maybe, and I think this is the main one, they are just a bunch of twats.

Good points, well made.

Apart from there's no maybe about it.
 
squirtyflower said:
MTAM said:
[
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.red11.org/mufc/stats/attendances.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.red11.org/mufc/stats/attendances.htm</a>
Cheers for that, they make incredibly interesting reading. Their attendances were incredibly low for a long time, and much lower than City's.
How's that for history eh?
i;ll second that,cheers..11k..12k...18k in the 2nd tier of football.what goes around comes around..I do know city moved from hyde rd because pulling 40k was a regular thing for us and hyde rd was far too small for that size attendance where safety was concerned.We were the real madrid/barcelona of football much to the FA;s distaste,who looked at Villa as the gentlemans club.Hense the reason for a jumped up charge from them that desroyed us.NOW WE ARE BACK.........Vengance is ours,the giant has awoke....
 
LCBblue said:
Has some City fan photoshopped that?!

Or are tyhey serious?

If they're serious, thick pricks! They just don't get it...

No. Posted by a red on another forum. Tried to make a point. Back fired big time.
 
i8therags said:
squirtyflower said:
Cheers for that, they make incredibly interesting reading. Their attendances were incredibly low for a long time, and much lower than City's.
How's that for history eh?
i;ll second that,cheers..11k..12k...18k in the 2nd tier of football.what goes around comes around..I do know city moved from hyde rd because pulling 40k was a regular thing for us and hyde rd was far too small for that size attendance where safety was concerned.We were the real madrid/barcelona of football much to the FA;s distaste,who looked at Villa as the gentlemans club.Hense the reason for a jumped up charge from them that desroyed us.NOW WE ARE BACK.........Vengance is ours,the giant has awoke....

No worries. Only took a couple of minutes to google them.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.