Been a long time fan, just joined the forum, been lurking for a few years. The thing is, with Sterling, people can't seem to talk about him rationally. It is either he is shit and or he is going to be Neymar and Hazard level. You can't criticize him or praise him, without either side berating each other. Sterling is a good player when he has space to run into, but when you take that away he really struggles.
Sterling has 2 traits which make him stand out, his pace (Only Sane is quicker) and his intelligence (No winger in our team comes close to that). He has an immaculate ability to make runs and drag defenders out of space. However, he also has his limitations, when I say his technique is not good enough, he is still better than most players, but that doesn't say much, for where we want to be, you have to one of the best in the world at keeping the ball in your position. I have never seen a player at City for past 8 years fail to make simple passes or fumble when the ball is at his feet as much as Sterling does. He also came out and said last year, he couldn't adapt to the one-two touch game Pellegrini had. So when I say, writing is on the wall, I don't mean, ship him out in a box of tomatoes tomorrow morning, rather he is not going to have a nailed on place like he did this year. He really needs to improve the way he shoots the ball and his balance in very tight spaces. As for the end of the season, he was ineffective when Jesus Navas was overlapping him. Just for the record, I think he was top 3 players for us this season as a whole but would also classify him as the weakest link in our attack. You may disagree with me, and that is completely ok, but I really hope the talk of Sterling isn't so black and white. People need to give him credit but recognize his shortcomings.