I find that believable. Not because the source might be, could well be total speculation on their part. Just because it sounds like it would make sense.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Raheem Sterling | Joins Chelsea for £50m
- Thread starter Blue Smarties
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
I find that believable. Not because the source might be, could well be total speculation on their part. Just because it sounds like it would make sense.
Otamendi's Beard
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 3,922
Been a great servant to the club but its probably the right time for him to move on.
Fake news.
"Sterling will not come to Barcelona for various reasons.
Among others, Tebas and the LFP (Spanish FA) do not accept it."
if he doesnt renew and city have to sell who is let besides psg
It wouldn't, even if we sanction it, Barcelona don't have €10m to offer so there's no guarantees how it will look in the summer. Moreover, loaning, be it for months, makes us look weak and a laughing stock. A player of Sterling's reputation elsewhere would get sold for a lot of money, won't be any talk of this loan nonsense.I find that believable. Not because the source might be, could well be total speculation on their part. Just because it sounds like it would make sense.
This is exactly why he will renew imo, there's nowhere he can really go who's on the same level as us when it comes to competing. Only options are Cheslea or Liverpool, and we know neither of those are happening. Anywhere else is simply an ongoing rebuild or an ambitious project, he'd be wise to work hard and find form, even a player like Bernardo with his reputation and form carried from last season could not get a move, same with Cancelo or Laporte or any of the names linked away. It's not easy to move from City unless you're entirely washed and moving on because you don't belong. Sterling can still be a great asset for us, that's how I look at it.if he doesnt renew and city have to sell who is let besides psg
End of day, La Liga move is a big if scenario, and I doubt Liverpool would take him back, or if there's anyone else who wants him. That's all. The easiest link is always PSG so you know it's not on. Far possibility but if Arsenal pull off a blinder and manage to secure European football, then I can see him rejoining Arteta because that's the man who helped him find peak form.
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
And the not too insignificant fact that Jack is miles better.The Grealish transfer displaced Sterling meaning that it's very difficult for him to secure a place in our starting line-up given the scale of investment in Grealish.
Saddleworth2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 21,684
I’ll agree with that when he has half the number of goals and assists that Sterling has.And the not too insignificant fact that Jack is miles better.
Yeah, you'd think that was obvious at this moment in time but whilst posters try and use stats to try and convince others that Jack hasn't been a success, just watching him play is more than enough to convince me. Not a resounding one so far, granted, but then if you're willing to look a bit further than the nose on your face it's easy to see why we bought him.And the not too insignificant fact that Jack is miles better.
He offers far more control, rarely loses possession in the areas that Sterling does, thus negating the counter attack we often find ourselves defending when Sterling has run into another blind alley.
The rest will come once he's settled in but there's a section of our fanbase who will always judge him on a ridiculous price tag and nothing else.
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
Wouldn’t that make him half as good ?I’ll agree with that when he has half the number of goals and assists that Sterling has.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.