I always ask myself in these situations: "If he wasn't already our player, would we want to sign him now?". If the answer is no, the player should be moved on asap.
Do I think that City would sign Raheem Sterling if he was available in the January window? I honestly think we would. Indeed, if it wasn't for their inability to match his wages, I would expect all the top European clubs to be in for him. He's got plenty to offer and, on form, I'd rather see him playing for City than against us.
If he goes to Barcelona, I suspect it would be an initial 6 month loan deal, with him returning to City when Barcelona can't afford to buy him or afford his wages. At which point, I return to my first paragraph and ask the questions again.
Only Newcastle need him though so unless he wants to sit on a bench for similar wages as he's on now its hard to see the point tbh.United (he grew up a Rag)
Paris (said he might start learning French)
Liverpool (his kids are Liverpool fans, and would repair the relationship he has with their fans which I’m sure he’s gutted about as I think he still likes them)
Newcastle (would be a good move for him, he’d be their Robinho moment)
Over reaction of the yearive stuck up for raheem when all around have been giving him stick,however ,keep your fucking gob shut, get your head down,work harder and improve, that's the only way you are getting back into the team, you've done fuck all for the best part of a year for city, if you don't like it dont go blabbing to the press,shithouse.