If Sterling leaves, which isn't a certainty, then we won't replace him IMO. Whether he goes or doesn't we will buy a striker in the summer and it won't be a Lacazette I can promise you that.That’s a bit harsh on Sterling who is most definitely not a natural striker.
Lacazette has been hugely disappointing since he joined the Arse.
We can do much much better than an ageing disinterested striker to replace Raheem.
Yes we can,but that wasn't my point,and he would still be a better option for our team right now.That’s a bit harsh on Sterling who is most definitely not a natural striker.
Lacazette has been hugely disappointing since he joined the Arse.
We can do much much better than an ageing disinterested striker to replace Raheem.
Fair play mate, we’re all entitled to our opinions.Yes we can,but that wasn't my point,and he would still be a better option for our team right now.
Lacazette is a very good player,he wouldnt be expensive,and he would provide a much needed presence and outlet,you underestimate him
Yeah always selling under their market price. Sterling is 80M. There‘s no many good wingers out there. Mcatee isn‘t even a winger. Why does everyone want central midfielders to replace our wingers?I think we should just accept any offer, renew Mcatee's contract and give him Sterling's recent playing time.
Bollocks :-)
A couple of years ago I thought that moving him into the middle would be the making of him.
But nope.
You know what I meant. Don't be this disingenuous and pedantic in the same instance.The making of a 100 goal 300 appearance premier league footballer,
Nope