Raheem Sterling | Joins Chelsea for £50m

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think the club would even be bothered on the fee. We have had our money back in trophies, goals and all round contribution. Our issue now is huge wages and a contract running down.

Let him go and replace or give time to Palmer. Palmer is definitely not contributing any less at the moment
 
I don't think the club would even be bothered on the fee. We have had our money back in trophies, goals and all round contribution. Our issue now is huge wages and a contract running down.

Let him go and replace or give time to Palmer. Palmer is definitely not contributing any less at the moment

If they aren't. They should. When we want Grealish. We have to pay 100m. When Pep next summer wants to replace Ferna with Rice or Bellingham. We have to pay 100m.

While we continue to sell our players for a fraction of those fees. How sustainable is that?
 
If they aren't. They should. When we want Grealish. We have to pay 100m. When Pep next summer wants to replace Ferna with Rice or Bellingham. We have to pay 100m.

While we continue to sell our players for a fraction of those fees. How sustainable is that?
Why would we buy rice or Bellingham for 100m? Not a chance we go near either.
 
50m - Newcastle? PSG? Barca? Madrid? Liverpool? Arsenal? Spurs?

I would probably be tempted to sell in January if anyone came up with that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.