Real Dilemma

[Macker]

But he's already bought a house in Alderley Edge and enrolled his kids into school and Mancini is going to Inter in a straight swap, does that mean we have sacked Frank Lampard as well.

I believe Man Ure are just about to sack Moyes for being a goggley eyed t@*t.

 

[Petetheblu]

Jason manford is hilarious end of

Jason Manford is a decent bloke, he did an event for the Ambulance Service recently for free. NO PRESS involvement, just gave up his night and had time for anyone who wanted to chat at the end (not just City related).

Very nice man. Quite tall as well.

 

[Soulboy]

So let me get this straight...

We've sacked a manager who we've not yet actually appointed... the manager, who signed the deal to come to City, is actually wanting the job at Madrid.... beggaring the question as to why he signed the contract to come to City in the first place... and the club have cancelled the contract because of Mourinho's outpourings about getting the job at Madrid... in spite of these outpourings going back at least 12 months...

Yep. All makes perfect sense.

 

[Halfpenny]

 

[mancity5]

Why would he leave Chelsea anyway ?

 

[The Fat el Hombre]

Stop making crap threads fbloke

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

So let me get this straight...

We've sacked a manager who we've not yet actually appointed... the manager, who signed the deal to come to City, is actually wanting the job at Madrid.... beggaring the question as to why he signed the contract to come to City in the first place... and the club have cancelled the contract because of Mourinho's outpourings about getting the job at Madrid... in spite of these outpourings going back at least 12 months...

Yep. All makes perfect sense.

Soulboy, think you might be splitting hairs, although can see the need for clarification.

A verbal agreement is all is takes, would actually support info from other sources in terms of an agreement of some sorts actually being in place?

Not so sure, we have sacked it off, though. We have gone down this road before, though.

A definite verbal agreement was in place with Kaka and his father, we pulled the plug due to outside shenanigans.

 

[Soulboy]

So let me get this straight...

We've sacked a manager who we've not yet actually appointed... the manager, who signed the deal to come to City, is actually wanting the job at Madrid.... beggaring the question as to why he signed the contract to come to City in the first place... and the club have cancelled the contract because of Mourinho's outpourings about getting the job at Madrid... in spite of these outpourings going back at least 12 months...

Yep. All makes perfect sense.

Soulboy, think you might be splitting hairs, although can see the need for clarification.

A verbal agreement is all is takes, would actually support info from other sources in terms of an agreement of some sorts actually being in place?

Not so sure, we have sacked it off, though. We have gone down this road before, though.

A definite verbal agreement was in place with Kaka and his father, we pulled the plug due to outside shenanigans.

So what you're saying is that we can sack someone with whom we have a verbal agreement with in the future! And the reason for scrapping the contract is due to reasons that have been known for over 12 months already?

That's not splitting hairs... that's an axe down the middle of the forehead!

Or are we just being prepared for the inevitable "Mourinho isn't coming here after all"... which is what I've believed since the rumours first started up.

So much for it all being a done deal then...

 

[Didsbury Dave]

April 1st

 

[Soulboy]

April 1st

That's what I thought.

But the OP INSISTS it's not.

Maybe I'm too gullible!

He's a twat if it is a wind up, though! Gulp.