Same as when they automatically pull out a yellow if a Liverpool player goes into a bad tackle just so they can ward off any worse punishment. Meanwhile our opponents know the card isn't coming and it ends up with the Dallas injury. Game management for you.Think it was a free kick for offside taken from slightly wrong position. What was interesting in that game was linesman flagging Newcastle offside straight away with no of this see if a chance happens and refer to var malarkey.
If you don’t understand the concept numerous posters have tried to instill in you by now, there’s nothing I can say that will change your mind now.The ref was piss poor but people blaming him for a thick footballer not having the sense to go in for a tackle that could injure them or the other player isn’t the refs fault is it?
No idea how people dont understand this… you also see plenty of refs say youve had 1 this time your booked after the second challenge. Dallas got to 5 and still wasnt booked, he probably thought why not just continue to hit them if no penalty was going to come from it. Unfortunately for him, he got his deserved comeuppance for once. Poor Officiating totally caused it.He explained why the referee could be at fault here. If the referee had cautioned Dallas after his fourth foul, for persistent misconduct, Dallas would have been much more circumspect for the remainder of the game. Tierney was complicit in putting both players at risk of serious injury.
If you don’t understand the concept numerous posters have tried to instill in you by now, there’s nothing I can say that will change your mind now.
Players change their behavior when on a yellow card. I think the challenge in question was relatively innocuous given the game, but I think Dallas would have been more prudent had the ref tightened the game up a little once the challenges started getting a little tasty.
Grealish and Foden were targeted by Marsch, because they were the chief playmakers in the side Pep picked. They were CONSTANTLY being fouled. Nothing too dangerous, but attritional fouls designed to have them lay the ball off earlier, avoid contact and, overall, reduce their effectiveness.
These are things that go on in the game that some people fail to see…the game within the game, if you will.
Dallas had already committed a poor foul that Marsch didn’t even think was a foul! That tells you the difference between views of both how the game should be played and, more specifically, the tone and tenor of this Leeds performance.
The referee sets the tone on what is and is not acceptable. He have two early fouls/yellows for players being pulled back. A non-violent, non-dangerous foul.
However, as the challenges started coming in, I think Tierney realized that he had two choices: use yellow cards and nip it in the bud OR give the teams much greater latitude lest he need to give a few reds in the second half. He chose the latter and set a tone that allowed too much to go unpunished.
He, like many modern refs, is weak. He “stamps” his authority on bullshit issues and then let’s actual foul play go, because he’s made a rod for his own back.
I just wish refs understood what PLAYERS don’t like, what endangers them, and creates tensions within the game to rise.
For me, a good ref tamps down rising tensions within the game, understands the on-field internal battles, and MANAGES the flow of the game in a way that players understand where they stand before they even start the game.
The pre-game ritual of Captains delivering the team sheets to the Officials is the perfect opportunity to set that tone. I honestly don’t know what gets said in those moments, but it is clearly not be used as it should.
That performance by Tierney provided all the evidence needed to show why he is totally unfit to referee .
Same with Tanganga back in August, numeric warnings, no card shown then just carried on hacking our lads with no consequences and got MOTM (If I remembered correctly, could be wrong on that!).No idea how people dont understand this… you also see plenty of refs say youve had 1 this time your booked after the second challenge. Dallas got to 5 and still wasnt booked, he probably thought why not just continue to hit them if no penalty was going to come from it. Unfortunately for him, he got his deserved comeuppance for once. Poor Officiating totally caused it.
Yep. Like that season we had 10+ leg breakers against us, of which not one saw a red (few werent even given as fouls), then delph over stretched for one (Wigan away i think in the Cup), straight red!!Same with Tanganga back in August, numeric warnings, no card shown then just carried on hacking our lads with no consequences and got MOTM (If I remembered correctly, could be wrong on that!).
Shame there was no VAR for our game againIt could have easily been a red. When Leeds were preparing a sub I thought they were being optimistic
It depends who the barge is on or by PaulHe was terrible and his absolutely useless performance led to that thug Dallas injuring himself ( Rather him than one of our players) I also believe he was the ref at Liverpool who failed to send that other thug Millner off. Although not thankfully crucial to the result he denied Sterling as clear a penalty as you'll see at Leeds. As Gordon was denied one in similar circumstances against Liverpool are we to understand now that barging opponents over in the area isn't a penalty? If that's the case, stop tackling and just shove opponents over.
If you don’t understand the concept numerous posters have tried to instill in you by now, there’s nothing I can say that will change your mind now.
Players change their behavior when on a yellow card. I think the challenge in question was relatively innocuous given the game, but I think Dallas would have been more prudent had the ref tightened the game up a little once the challenges started getting a little tasty.
Grealish and Foden were targeted by Marsch, because they were the chief playmakers in the side Pep picked. They were CONSTANTLY being fouled. Nothing too dangerous, but attritional fouls designed to have them lay the ball off earlier, avoid contact and, overall, reduce their effectiveness.
These are things that go on in the game that some people fail to see…the game within the game, if you will.
Dallas had already committed a poor foul that Marsch didn’t even think was a foul! That tells you the difference between views of both how the game should be played and, more specifically, the tone and tenor of this Leeds performance.
The referee sets the tone on what is and is not acceptable. He have two early fouls/yellows for players being pulled back. A non-violent, non-dangerous foul.
However, as the challenges started coming in, I think Tierney realized that he had two choices: use yellow cards and nip it in the bud OR give the teams much greater latitude lest he need to give a few reds in the second half. He chose the latter and set a tone that allowed too much to go unpunished.
He, like many modern refs, is weak. He “stamps” his authority on bullshit issues and then let’s actual foul play go, because he’s made a rod for his own back.
I just wish refs understood what PLAYERS don’t like, what endangers them, and creates tensions within the game to rise.
For me, a good ref tamps down rising tensions within the game, understands the on-field internal battles, and MANAGES the flow of the game in a way that players understand where they stand before they even start the game.
The pre-game ritual of Captains delivering the team sheets to the Officials is the perfect opportunity to set that tone. I honestly don’t know what gets said in those moments, but it is clearly not be used as it should.