Yeah, I don’t quite understand people considering the Upamecano and Akanji handballs similar incidents.
One was a player charging down a shot with his arms tucked behind his back before he intentionally stuck out only one arm when he saw the ball might go by him on that side (he didn’t extend his other arm, so it wasn’t for balance). No deflection on the way, his arm was in an unnatural position (he had already tucked his arms, there was no physical reason to stretch his arm back out as he was jumping and turning), and it deviated the path of the ball. He could have completely blocked it but was just “unlucky” with his timing.
The other was a player defending on the end line, literally shoulder to shoulder with the attacker, could not have been closer to the ball without laying on it, with his arms in a natural position (same as the attacker he was defending), and the attacker kicks the ball off the players foot and it deflects up in to his arm. Ball wasn’t going toward goal, and it was barely even in play.
You could say both should be given by the letter of the law, and that’s fine, but you can’t say they are the same.
And I personally think the Upamecano handball was nailed on (and not giving it would start a free-for-all by defenders in the box) and the Akanji handball was harsh.
Thankfully, neither really impacted the outcome of the match.