Reform 2025 Limited new name same business

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Is something he has written there untrue?

His last sentence is definitely untrue.

 

[BlueHammer85]

I can't believe how someone in Farage's position - grifting twat that he is - doesn't understand this. I expect it off Tommy Two Names Robinson but I don't expect it off that frog-faced prick.

He fully understands, same for that twat sidekick Tice. pair of cunts.

 

[mosssideblue]

He fully understands, same for that twat sidekick Tice. pair of cunts.

Add 30p as well and we have a trio of cunts

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

Yes. Because anyone with half a fucking brain cell can see that it was cunts like Farage who stoked up the riots by spreading misinformation about the perpetrator being an asylum seeker - misinformation that he got off Andrew Fucking Tate ffs. Angela Rayner said fuck-all wrong - all she was saying was that we should wait for the outcome of the investigation because to dive in and publically air thoughts on what may or my not be true could put the case in jeopardy. I can't believe how someone in Farage's position - grifting twat that he is - doesn't understand this. I expect it off Tommy Two Names Robinson but I don't expect it off that frog-faced prick.

What he's written there is nothing short of a fucking disgrace. It's straight up gaslighting and projection because it was HE who was responsible for helping spread the misinformation that led to the riots. I hope his next shit is a fucking hedgehog.

Yes, but which bit is factually incorrect? I get that he's an opportunist and his politics are unpleasant etc.

 

[denislawsbackheel]

I hope Farage is as ill as he looks.

 

[M18CTID]

Yes, but which bit is factually incorrect? I get that he's an opportunist and his politics are unpleasant etc.

Did you not bother reading my post? The bit where he was accusing her of spreading disinformation. He's getting mixed up with himself the shameless ****.

 

[Damocles]

Yes. Because anyone with half a fucking brain cell can see that it was cunts like Farage who stoked up the riots by spreading misinformation about the perpetrator being an asylum seeker - misinformation that he got off Andrew Fucking Tate ffs. Angela Rayner said fuck-all wrong - all she was saying was that we should wait for the outcome of the investigation because to dive in and publically air thoughts on what may or my not be true could put the case in jeopardy. I can't believe how someone in Farage's position - grifting twat that he is - doesn't understand this. I expect it off Tommy Two Names Robinson but I don't expect it off that frog-faced prick.

What he's written there is nothing short of a fucking disgrace. It's straight up gaslighting and projection because it was HE who was responsible for helping spread the misinformation that led to the riots. I hope his next shit is a fucking hedgehog.

Nigel Farage didn't stoke up riots.

Axel Rudakubana did that when he started knifing primary schoolers when he was bored.

And as I've previously written, the immigration issue on this country is starting to boil over after a quarter of a century of being ignored or insulted as racists. Riots in the streets will continue until the Government address it in a meaningful way.

 

[BlueHammer85]

Nigel Farage didn't stoke up riots.

Neil Basu – a former senior Scotland Yard officer who was in charge of counter-terrorism from 2018 to 2021 – said there were “real world consequences”

“Nigel Farage is giving the EDL [English Defence League] succour, undermining the police, creating conspiracy theories, and giving a false basis for the attacks on the police,” he said, referring to the far-right, Islamophobic group whose supporters are believed to have been involved in the rioting in Southport.

“Has Nigel Farage condemned the violence? Has he condemned the EDL? Fomenting discord in society is what these people seem to exist for,”

 

[M18CTID]

Nigel Farage didn't stoke up riots.

Axel Rudakubana did that when he started knifing primary schoolers when he was bored.

And as I've previously written, the immigration issue on this country is starting to boil over after a quarter of a century of being ignored or insulted as racists. Riots in the streets will continue until the Government address it in a meaningful way.

I disagree entirely. He helped spread misinformation about the name of the perpetrator and where he was from. Without that misinformation there would've been no riots IMO, and there certainly wouldn't have been a load of knuckle-draggers descending on Southport attacking the police and the local mosque.

 

[Damocles]

I disagree entirely. He helped spread misinformation about the name of the perpetrator and where he was from. Without that misinformation there would've been no riots IMO, and there certainly wouldn't have been a load of knuckle-draggers descending on Southport attacking the police and mosques.

That is subjective, a possible, and not really provable.

What is provable is that they wouldn't have happened if he didn't knife those kids.

This isn't a fair question and I know this and I'm not trying to be belligerent, but I find it odd that you unleash a torrent of righteous fury against Farage, a democratically elected politician, more than you did when discussing the psycho who knifed a girls ballet class for fun. Why is this? This feels like misplaced rage.

 

[hilts]

Did you not bother reading my post? The bit where he was accusing her of spreading disinformation. He's getting mixed up with himself the shameless ****.

He's a politician of course he's a shameless ****. Him and his party would be far less prevalent if people including posters on here, particularly one, didn't have some strange obsession with him, the party, twiterr/x, musk and GB News we get all their propaganda on here.

Way to spread the word on their behalf.

Hate twitter hate Musk

Read it all day and forward it on to others.

Hilarious.

 

[M18CTID]

That is subjective, a possible, and not really provable.

What is provable is that they wouldn't have happened if he didn't knife those kids.

This isn't a fair question and I know this and I'm not trying to be belligerent, but I find it odd that you unleash a torrent of righteous fury against Farage, a democratically elected politician, more than you did when discussing the psycho who knifed a girls ballet class for fun. Why is this? This feels like misplaced rage.

That's fair enough but you can sit there with a straight face and say that Farage didn't fan the flames of those riots. You're an intelligent person and I don't believe for one minute that you truly believe that 100%

As for the last paragraph, come off it mate. I've plenty of anger towards the **** who committed those murders and I've said so on the relevant thread. Just to flip that one round, I've not seen much from yourself though on that, so does that mean you're more arsed about people attacking Farage on the relevant thread than you are about the murderer? ;)

 

[M18CTID]

He's a politician of course he's a shameless ****. Him and his party would be far less prevalent if people including posters on here, particularly one, didn't have some strange obsession with him, the party, twiterr/x, musk and GB News we get all their propaganda on here.

Way to spread the word on their behalf.

Hate twitter hate Musk

Read it all day and forward it on to others.

Hilarious.

Last time I looked, it was a forum mate. That means people are going to discuss things. All manner of things. Are you saying you've got a right to tell people what they can and can't discuss?

Oh, and I think you'll find that with the likes of Musk backing them, they won't suddenly stop becoming relevant if we all stopped talking about them on here.

Hilarious.

 

[Damocles]

Neil Basu – a former senior Scotland Yard officer who was in charge of counter-terrorism from 2018 to 2021 – said there were “real world consequences”

“Nigel Farage is giving the EDL [English Defence League] succour, undermining the police, creating conspiracy theories, and giving a false basis for the attacks on the police,” he said, referring to the far-right, Islamophobic group whose supporters are believed to have been involved in the rioting in Southport.

“Has Nigel Farage condemned the violence? Has he condemned the EDL? Fomenting discord in society is what these people seem to exist for,”

Neil Basu also claims that the Police are institutionally racist, was considering suing the Government for him not getting a job because he thought it was racist, that the Southport killer shouldn't be labelled a terrorist and that the Police should suppress white candidates for senior roles.

Not the worst opinions in the world but citing him as if he's an independent observer and expert without bias isn't fair

 

[hilts]

Last time I looked, it was a forum mate. That means people are going to discuss things. All manner of things. Are you saying you've got a right to tell people what they can and can't discuss?

Oh, and I think you'll find that with the likes of Musk backing them, they won't suddenly stop becoming relevant if we all stopped talking about them on here.

Hilarious.

I never said anything of the sort. I would think on that one.

 

[meltonblue]

Yes, but which bit is factually incorrect? I get that he's an opportunist and his politics are unpleasant etc.

I can’t see anything in there that is factually correct.

 

[M18CTID]

I never said anything of the sort. I would think on that one.

That's what you implied. I see this upstairs when people post tweets from the likes of Magic Twat and Nick Harris in the charges thread and others jump on it saying don't give them the oxygen. As long as it's in the CoC, no-one has a right to tell another poster what they can and can't post. Last time I looked, this was the Reform thread so what do you expect people to discuss on this thread if it's not Farage, Anderson, Tice, et al? What do you expect people to discuss on the Elon Musk thread if it's not Musk?

 

[Damocles]

That's fair enough but you can sit there with a straight face and say that Farage didn't fan the flames of those riots. You're an intelligent person and I don't believe for one minute that you truly believe that 100%

As for the last paragraph, come off it mate. I've plenty of anger towards the **** who committed those murders and I've said so on the relevant thread. Just to flip that one round, I've not seen much from yourself though on that, so does that mean you're more arsed about people attacking Farage on the relevant thread than you are about the murderer? ;)

Yeah even as I was making the point I thought it was a stupid one, but I was trying to say something about how it's strange how people divide their anger but I didn't think it out. Sorry about that, there's a point in there but it's half baked.

Anyway, in terms of Farage and fanning the flames - obviously Farage's entire rhetoric didn't help a d his contribution level is above zero. But people were rioting because those kids died needlessly and they thought the Police and Government's handling of things is bullshit. I'm not sure what percentage thought he was an illegal immigrant or asylum seeker but I imagine that it's close to 99%.

With that said, and another possible half baked one coming at you here, it's possible that the Southport riots were a net positive. Rioting is a terrible thing but often an effective thing. Just like the BLM riots served to show the media and the wider population the level of anger and resentment in the community, these anti-immigration riots have put the issue right at the top of the Government's agenda again. Combined with the boat crossings and the various asylum seeker hotel stories then the heat is getting turned up.

Farage didn't help but to put this at his door rather than decades of snobbery, ignorance and gaslighting isn't really fair

 

[hcblue95]

Yes, but which bit is factually incorrect? I get that he's an opportunist and his politics are unpleasant etc.

Shock, who comes in to bat for Farage.

 

[hilts]

That's what you implied. I see this upstairs when people post tweets from the likes of Magic Twat and Nick Harris in the charges thread and others jump on it saying don't give them the oxygen. As long as it's in the CoC, no-one has a right to tell another poster what they can and can't post. Last time I looked, this was the Reform thread so what do you expect people to discuss on this thread if it's not Farage, Anderson, Tice, et al? What do you expect people to discuss on the Elon Musk thread if it's not Musk?

A) I didn't imply that, I said one poster in particular had an obsession with all things twitter farage etc and are spreading their words on their behalf. I never once implied or said they shouldn't be discussed. So sorry you are wrong.

B) You are right no can tell.anyone what to post, I never asked anyone or implied that someone should be stopped. I just posted my own opinion which by your own words I'm entitles to do. There was no obligation on your part to even reply.

C) I never said people shouldn't discuss Farage, I said in my opinion it is way over done including promoting their twitter ramblings every fucking day.

And to clarify to avoid further confusion, in a free country you are entitled to read posts, completely miss the point and reply with nonsense. And I'm entitled to explain that is exactly what you have done.

As you were.