I agree with you but this issue is going to get a lot of discussion in the coming months.
No I wouldn't feel comfortable but equally people should be allowed freedom of choice. But maybe if they refuse rightly there should be some consequences absolutely.Of course mate, but would you feel comfortable someone who refused the vaccine sitting next to you on a plane?
Even if you were, others on the plane would have something to say about it, as would the destinations receiving that plane load.
I don’t think that any government in their right minds would make a vaccine compulsory but I don’t see any reason why those that choose to have it can’t be treated more favourably than those who refuse if there are clear consequences after refusing the jab...No I wouldn't feel comfortable but equally people should be allowed freedom of choice. But maybe if they refuse rightly there should be some consequences absolutely.
I just dont like the way some of this is going and there is a sense of controlling which I dont think is completely right.
No I wouldn't feel comfortable but equally people should be allowed freedom of choice. But maybe if they refuse rightly there should be some consequences absolutely.
I just dont like the way some of this is going and there is a sense of controlling which I dont think is completely right.
They have a choice though ?Well I don't agree DD to be honest.
100% I will have it but people should have the right to refuse it - some people might not like needles etc?
So where we are getting to is saying to people basically you have to be vaccinated or else your banned from stuff?
Personally I think that's not right.
Doesn’t that depend who is the one at risk. If you are vaccinated and the person next to you is the one not vaccinated is the one putting themselves at risk. Similar to somebody 2 years ago could have refused a flu vaccine may have been putting themselves at risk sitting next to another person that had had the flu vaccine.Of course mate, but would you feel comfortable someone who refused the vaccine sitting next to you on a plane?
Even if you were, others on the plane would have something to say about it, as would the destinations receiving that plane load.
Doesn’t that depend who is the one at risk. If you are vaccinated and the person next to you is the one not vaccinated is the one putting themselves at risk. Similar to somebody 2 years ago could have refused a flu vaccine may have been putting themselves at risk sitting next to another person that had had the flu vaccine.
I’m particularly not against a vaccination certificate, nor am I against airlines, other countries etc asking for one, but I’m far from convinced it will happen.
Yes, think that’s far more likely, that the country of arrival will ask for immunisation certificate, same as they ask for things like yellow fever cert in some countries.There is still work being done to establish how transmissible the virus will be even if you have had the jab?
What can't be disputed if a person without the jab was able to travel, is the wider risk they pose to people in another country they arrive in.
Agreed. It’s only a violation of human rights if the vaccine is made mandatory....but don’t get your knickers in a twist if you turn down the jab and can’t attend football matches, concerts and fly abroad either.Hopefully the ones who chose not to have the vaccine aren't allowed at games.
Of course mate, but would you feel comfortable someone who refused the vaccine sitting next to you on a plane?
Even if you were, others on the plane would have something to say about it, as would the destinations receiving that plane load.