Richards sub...

D D

DAGW

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 Dec 2008
Messages
1,368
Location
Watching Bernardo's goal on repeat
Richards obviously had to be subbed there. That was clear.

But why's he brought on Fernandes? we saw what happened when he played fernandes for a defender against Tottenham!

Couldn't we have had an appearance from our Berti?
 
PBLZ129 said:
Richards obviously had to be subbed there. That was clear.

But why's he brought on Fernandes? we saw what happened when he played fernandes for a defender against Tottenham!

Couldn't we have had an appearance from our Berti?
Click to expand...



ned has gone right back,vinnie centre back and fernandes into midfield.
 
Gelson's been very good since he came on and no-one here has any idea whether Berti is a competent footballer, yet you'd still rather bring him on?

I'd rather bring on the player we know can do a job and make sure we get the 3 away points without taking any gambles.
 
Looked like it worked out well, Berti's main attribute is his place of birth. Says a lot.
 
It worked out and did well. He didn't do a bad job today. Richards seemed to do better defending today but with that said, so did all of our players. Despite the one mistake of bad marking I thought it was a good game.
 
I never thought i'd say this but well done Gelson, probably his best game this season, I was shocked. Still gave away 1 silly free kick in his Sun Jihai style. I still don't think he has enough to cut it at City but good game today.

And well done Richards for that superb block that I think was the cause of his injury and led to our second goal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top