City_Sean
Well-Known Member
are you being generally serious when you say lambert is a good enough player for us?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Rickie Lambert
- Thread starter mgreenz97
- Start date
mgreenz97
Well-Known Member
SuperMario's Fireworks. said:are you being generally serious when you say Lambert is a good enough player for us?
No I didn't say that, I just wanted to see what people would think of it.
City_Sean
Well-Known Member
mgreenz97 said:SuperMario's Fireworks. said:are you being generally serious when you say Lambert is a good enough player for us?
No I didn't say that, I just wanted to see what people would think of it.
sorry for going OTT then mate, i think it would be a massive step backwards if we signed him though.
mgreenz97
Well-Known Member
SuperMario's Fireworks. said:mgreenz97 said:SuperMario's Fireworks. said:are you being generally serious when you say Lambert is a good enough player for us?
No I didn't say that, I just wanted to see what people would think of it.
sorry for going OTT then mate, i think it would be a massive step backwards if we signed him though.
I don't think it'd be a step backwards. He'd be very cheap and would score at least 15 goals a season, more than Mario and Dzeko last season.
It certainly wouldn't be moving forward but he could be good to bring on when we're in dire need of a goal. It's obviously not gonna happen so this is really just pointless.
ell
Well-Known Member
Top WUMing take a bow
sergiokun
Well-Known Member
Good player and works hard but don't think it would ever happen
jollylescott
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 May 2012
- Messages
- 10,878
I thought being a Melbournite you would have suggested Archie Thompson or Marco Rojas, rather than Rickie Lambert (sorry this is an in house Aussie conversation).mgreenz97 said:SuperMario's Fireworks. said:mgreenz97 said:No I didn't say that, I just wanted to see what people would think of it.
sorry for going OTT then mate, i think it would be a massive step backwards if we signed him though.
I don't think it'd be a step backwards. He'd be very cheap and would score at least 15 goals a season, more than Mario and Dzeko last season.
It certainly wouldn't be moving forward but he could be good to bring on when we're in dire need of a goal. It's obviously not gonna happen so this is really just pointless.
mgreenz97
Well-Known Member
jollylescott said:I thought being a Melbournite you would have suggested Archie Thompson or Marco Rojas, rather than Rickie Lambert (sorry this is an in house Aussie conversation).mgreenz97 said:SuperMario's Fireworks. said:sorry for going OTT then mate, i think it would be a massive step backwards if we signed him though.
I don't think it'd be a step backwards. He'd be very cheap and would score at least 15 goals a season, more than Mario and Dzeko last season.
It certainly wouldn't be moving forward but he could be good to bring on when we're in dire need of a goal. It's obviously not gonna happen so this is really just pointless.
I think my Melbourne Victory bias may be affecting me because I would actually love to have Rojas at City.
I hang my head in shame.
Superb finisher vastly underrated. Won't be taken seriously because he played most of his career in lower leagues. People don't give these lads a chance anymore if he was called Ricardo lambertini and Southampton had signed him from Roma you'd all love him. Bet you'd all have Michu right now.