Right then - Did Man ever step foot on the moon?

[Anonymous]

I'd imagine it costs shiitloads of money.

yeah but not once in 30 years

Despite technological advances it would still be just as difficult to send another man on the moon and probably more expensive. We know whats on the moon, it's made up of the same rock that makes up the Earth's crust, as the moon is just remnants of Earth's twin planet, Thea, colliding with Earth 4.5 billion years ago, causing Thea to be obliterated and the debris smashed off Earth then formed the moon we see today.

NASA have also put in place instruments to carry out further tests from Earth. It would be a pointless exercise to go again. Instead NASA and other space programmes are putting resources into venturing furter into space.

You watched 'Catastrophe' the other night didn't you?

 

[Matty]

This is one of the greatest mysteries of human history.

If we went all them years ago then why the hell have we never been back? and considering all the advances in technology?

Anyone seen them videos of the flag blowing? that technically is impossible

We never stepped foot on the moon and dont let any yanks from area 51 tell you otherwise

I'd imagine we didn't go back to the moon because we anaylised the samples etc and discovered there wasn't anything worth going back their for. Plus the cost would have been preventative.

 

[Joycee Banercheck]

I'd imagine it costs shiitloads of money.

yeah but not once in 30 years

Despite technological advances it would still be just as difficult to send another man on the moon and probably more expensive. We know whats on the moon, it's made up of the same rock that makes up the Earth's crust, as the moon is just remnants of Earth's twin planet, Thea, colliding with Earth 4.5 billion years ago, causing Thea to be obliterated and the debris smashed off Earth then formed the moon we see today.

NASA have also put in place instruments to carry out further tests from Earth. It would be a pointless exercise to go again. Instead NASA and other space programmes are putting resources into venturing furter into space.

You watched 'Catastrophe' the other night didn't you?

No. I work for NASA! Honest!

 

[BingoBango]

 

[1.618034]

Anyone who's ever done any research of any kind whatsoever will realise that we DID LAND ON THE MOON! A few times!

Some good links from other posters on the subject, few if any from the doubters I notice though! Here's another one...

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Did%20we%20land%20on%20the%20Moon.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Did%20we% ... 20Moon.htm</a>

and one on The Cross Hairs which seems to be one of the main pillars of the Hoax Theory

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/Cross_Hairs.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/Cross_Hairs.htm</a>

and this link which is the entire Apollo mission photography library

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html</a>

Amazing stuff!

Try actually reading through some evidence properly instead of taking the "well I don't understand how they did it so it must be a hoax" line...
Just because the American government lie about some things doesn't mean they lie about everything!

I wonder whether there's a correlation between these doubters and the Hughes out brigade? It seems a similar level of short-sightedness and ignorance of reality pervades both camps... Just wondering?

 

[Cunning Stunt]

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html</a>

Some of the photo's there are mind blowing

(if it is real of course...)

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

I'd imagine it costs shiitloads of money.

yeah but not once in 30 years

Despite technological advances it would still be just as difficult to send another man on the moon and probably more expensive. We know whats on the moon, it's made up of the same rock that makes up the Earth's crust, as the moon is just remnants of Earth's twin planet, Thea, colliding with Earth 4.5 billion years ago, causing Thea to be obliterated and the debris smashed off Earth then formed the moon we see today.

NASA have also put in place instruments to carry out further tests from Earth. It would be a pointless exercise to go again. Instead NASA and other space programmes are putting resources into venturing furter into space.

You watched 'Catastrophe' the other night didn't you?

No. I work for NASA! Honest!

And just where in Heywood is NASA HQ?

 

[stony]

I'd imagine it costs shiitloads of money.

yeah but not once in 30 years

Despite technological advances it would still be just as difficult to send another man on the moon and probably more expensive. We know whats on the moon, it's made up of the same rock that makes up the Earth's crust, as the moon is just remnants of Earth's twin planet, Thea, colliding with Earth 4.5 billion years ago, causing Thea to be obliterated and the debris smashed off Earth then formed the moon we see today.

NASA have also put in place instruments to carry out further tests from Earth. It would be a pointless exercise to go again. Instead NASA and other space programmes are putting resources into venturing furter into space.

You watched 'Catastrophe' the other night didn't you?

No. I work for NASA! Honest!

And just where in Heywood is NASA HQ?

Green Lane, near the level crossing.

 

[Joycee Banercheck]

I'd imagine it costs shiitloads of money.

yeah but not once in 30 years

Despite technological advances it would still be just as difficult to send another man on the moon and probably more expensive. We know whats on the moon, it's made up of the same rock that makes up the Earth's crust, as the moon is just remnants of Earth's twin planet, Thea, colliding with Earth 4.5 billion years ago, causing Thea to be obliterated and the debris smashed off Earth then formed the moon we see today.

NASA have also put in place instruments to carry out further tests from Earth. It would be a pointless exercise to go again. Instead NASA and other space programmes are putting resources into venturing furter into space.

You watched 'Catastrophe' the other night didn't you?

No. I work for NASA! Honest!

And just where in Heywood is NASA HQ?

Green Lane, near the level crossing.

Spot on, Stony. NASA - Space Monkey Division, Green Lane.

And they thought it was called Monkeytown coz of holes in barstools.....

 

[stony]

I'd imagine it costs shiitloads of money.

yeah but not once in 30 years

Despite technological advances it would still be just as difficult to send another man on the moon and probably more expensive. We know whats on the moon, it's made up of the same rock that makes up the Earth's crust, as the moon is just remnants of Earth's twin planet, Thea, colliding with Earth 4.5 billion years ago, causing Thea to be obliterated and the debris smashed off Earth then formed the moon we see today.

NASA have also put in place instruments to carry out further tests from Earth. It would be a pointless exercise to go again. Instead NASA and other space programmes are putting resources into venturing furter into space.

You watched 'Catastrophe' the other night didn't you?

No. I work for NASA! Honest!

And just where in Heywood is NASA HQ?

Green Lane, near the level crossing.

Spot on, Stony. NASA - Space Monkey Division, Green Lane.

And they thought it was called Monkeytown coz of holes in barstools.....

Or because in Heywood dialect Heap Bridge sounds like "ape bridge"

 

[Joycee Banercheck]

Or because in Heywood dialect Heap Bridge sounds like "ape bridge"

Go on, Stony. Only a few people know that reason.

 

[The Fat el Hombre]

I'd imagine it costs shiitloads of money.

yeah but not once in 30 years

Despite technological advances it would still be just as difficult to send another man on the moon and probably more expensive. We know whats on the moon, it's made up of the same rock that makes up the Earth's crust, as the moon is just remnants of Earth's twin planet, Thea, colliding with Earth 4.5 billion years ago, causing Thea to be obliterated and the debris smashed off Earth then formed the moon we see today.

NASA have also put in place instruments to carry out further tests from Earth. It would be a pointless exercise to go again. Instead NASA and other space programmes are putting resources into venturing furter into space.

You watched 'Catastrophe' the other night didn't you?

No. I work for NASA! Honest!

And just where in Heywood is NASA HQ?

Green Lane, near the level crossing.

Spot on, Stony. NASA - Space Monkey Division, Green Lane.

And they thought it was called Monkeytown coz of holes in barstools.....

Or because in Heywood dialect Heap Bridge sounds like "ape bridge"

*TEST*

 

[denislawsbackheel]

This is one of the greatest mysteries of human history.

Jesus wept!

NO IT ISN'T.

 

[mat]

The Cybermen will invade there 2031 and will plan to destroy the earth by using it gravitational pull against it.

 

[Challenger1978]

Landing on the moon was the biggest political event of the 60's

Previous to the landing, Russia had successfully launched a satellite into space named Sputnik. This object could do nothing other than broadcast a 'beep beep' sound from space, but the press had it carrying bombs etc with which to destroy the American nation. The American public went into panic mode and believed they were on the verge of total destruction.

The American response was to put a man on the moon, to demostrate total American superiority in the space race.

If the moon landings were a con, why did the Russians never provided damning evidence to the public

The truth is the Russians monitored every single event and man did indeed step on the moon

I was just about to post the same thing Flyer

Btw for you lot that are interested we are going to the the moon and we are planning on setting up permanent bases there as well. What were after on the moon is two thing :-

1) Launching future space mission to explore the rest of the solar system, because of the moons low gravity it makes the problem of launching into space much easier & cheaper.

2) The moons surface is covered in a substance called Deuterium (helium 3), this substance is vital in the development and running of nuclear fusion plants (a nuclear power plant that works like a sun). And as there is estimated to be only 200kg of deuterium on earth its an extremely valuable resource though to be worth around 3 Billion dollars per metric tonne ($3000 per GRAM). And with the Moon though to have in excess of over one million tonnes (all close to the surface) you can see why man wants to go back to the moon.

 

[mat]

Landing on the moon was the biggest political event of the 60's

Previous to the landing, Russia had successfully launched a satellite into space named Sputnik. This object could do nothing other than broadcast a 'beep beep' sound from space, but the press had it carrying bombs etc with which to destroy the American nation. The American public went into panic mode and believed they were on the verge of total destruction.

The American response was to put a man on the moon, to demostrate total American superiority in the space race.

If the moon landings were a con, why did the Russians never provided damning evidence to the public

The truth is the Russians monitored every single event and man did indeed step on the moon

I was just about to post the same thing Flyer

Btw for you lot that are interested we are going to the the moon and we are planning on setting up permanent bases there as well. What were after on the moon is two thing :-

1) Launching future space mission to explore the rest of the solar system, because of the moons low gravity it makes the problem of launching into space much easier & cheaper.

2) The moons surface is covered in a substance called Deuterium (helium 3), this substance is vital in the development and running of nuclear fission plants (a nuclear power plant that works like a sun). And as there is estimated to be only 200kg of deuterium on earth its an extremely valuable resource though to be worth around 3 Billion dollars per metric tonne ($3000 per GRAM). And with the Moon though to have in excess of over one million tonnes (all close to the surface) you can see why man wants to go back to the moon.

******NERD ALERT!!!******

;0)

 

[johnmc]

2) The moons surface is covered in a substance called Deuterium (helium 3), this substance is vital in the development and running of nuclear fission plants (a nuclear power plant that works like a sun). And as there is estimated to be only 200kg of deuterium on earth its an extremely valuable resource though to be worth around 3 Billion dollars per metric tonne ($3000 per GRAM). And with the Moon though to have in excess of over one million tonnes (all close to the surface) you can see why man wants to go back to the moon.

who owns the moon if anyone - who will benefit from this Deuterium??

 

[mat]

2) The moons surface is covered in a substance called Deuterium (helium 3), this substance is vital in the development and running of nuclear fission plants (a nuclear power plant that works like a sun). And as there is estimated to be only 200kg of deuterium on earth its an extremely valuable resource though to be worth around 3 Billion dollars per metric tonne ($3000 per GRAM). And with the Moon though to have in excess of over one million tonnes (all close to the surface) you can see why man wants to go back to the moon.

who owns the moon if anyone - who will benefit from this Deuterium??

The Yanks as soon as they find Bin Ladin on there....

 

[tommcfc]

we'll never know

 

[johnmc]

So the common consensus is that no one landed on the moon??