Im sorry mate Im not following you at all. You are either being deliberately obtuse or maybe I am just a bit thick. Can you just explain in simple terms what you mean by 'untrue narrative' from media that you think some posters are following?
Something, that is quite obviously factual, although like most reporting aimed at selling stories, has been reported in
a journal that tailors it's output to it's audience's political leanings, so presents
the subjects in an unfavourable light. This, for the left
is the worst possible slight, which then becomes an all consuming hatred
for the messenger, so detraction is employed, with oblique
references to other past misdeeds committed by said messenger, in the hope that the truth can be lost amid an outburst of outrage.
Quite common, and human nature, really.