Riyad Mahrez

[pudge]

Like we were mental to turn down £45m, £50m, £55m? Please don't disrespect us and think that we need the money. The decisions made will be made on having full knowledge of the situation.

Nobody has said you need the money.

The fact is you have a player who doesn't want to be at your club, whose value will only decrease from now the longer he stays and you've an offer of £60m for him.

It's not unfair to say your club would be stupid to turn that down.

Now stop playing the victim card, be rational and stop being so precious.

 

[Machiavelli]

Probably a bit upset, we might be if a bigger club

was coming in for our prize asset.

Lol. I love their pain.

 

[Dribble]

Saying Mahrez can succeed at a higher level and handle life at a bigger club is an indirect way of saying Mahrez is too good for Leicester.
I really don't see your point. He's too good for a team with the ambition of finishing in mid table positions. Thats no disrespect or arrogant dig at Leicester, that's me just stating how highly I rate Riyad Mahrez.

I also don't forget where we have come from- we were once a club who worried that better and bigger clubs would take our star players off us, but football has moved on and we aren't that club anymore.

That's as may be, but I won't forget the despair of knowing bigger clubs can take our players any time they wanted. However, there is the Raggish 'Mahrez is too good for Leicester' or 'Marez is a good player who can succeed at a higher level'. One is Raggish arrogance, the other is respectful fact. I'm not saying you yourself are arrogant, but there is a diplomatic way of saying things, albeit the end game is the same.

I'm just respectful in that way.

 

[The Salfordian]

Foxeh , he obviously doesn't want to be at Leicester, if any if our players didn't want to play for us if be happy with them going.

Can't see City being held to ransom anymore of anybody either.

 

[Len Rum]

This will be done at £65 million plus add ons of £5 million probably based on our trophy haul at the end of the season IMO.

This is Bluemoon mate, not red cafe.

 

[remember arthur mann]

SSN transfer programme with Alan McInaly " big gamble at 29/30 at 60m"...everyone in the studio corrected him "hes 26"."Is he ? in that case rewind 30 seconds Id tell Leicester to keep him hes done this before"........my points
1. Didnt the rags just gamble with Sanchez ? 35 m + (35m) Mikity going the other way + 500k a week wages
2. 60m for a 26 year old winger who is a class player is not a gamble
3. example of how thick most pundits are

Had lunch with Wilkins !!

 

[Dogtanian]

Roland and Zammo took no notice.

Zammo got hooked, don’t remember Roland shooting up, would have done wonders for his weight problems though

 

[Machiavelli]

Nobody has said you need the money.

The fact is you have a player who doesn't want to be at your club, whose value will only decrease from now the longer he stays and you've an offer of £60m for him.

It's not unfair to say your club would be stupid to turn that down.

Now stop playing the victim card, be rational and stop being so precious.

I think he’s a 14 year old virgin.

 

[tonea2003]

Like we were mental to turn down £45m, £50m, £55m? Please don't disrespect us and think that we need the money. The decisions made will be made on having full knowledge of the situation.

no disrespect mate,but do you know the "full knowledge" or are you putting 2 and 2 together like the majority on here?

 

[Bellamy's Caddy]

We thought this was the case with Sanchez, don’t get your hopes up yet!

Very true! I've got some money riding on this so already resigned myself to this not happening haha