BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Eh?Strong rumours? All the "rumours I have seen are at 75m including Roberts or 60m without.
Eh?Strong rumours? All the "rumours I have seen are at 75m including Roberts or 60m without.
The exact opposite of what I said mate.
I think its the other way round, but also in euros.
Hmmnm. Threatening to dump Roberts on Leicester’s doorstep if they DONT lower their asking price for Mahrez!!
Not really I've been down the pub and sorry to break your illusion but your posts are not really that important in the scheme of things.Are you ignoring my posts?
Well Einstein what value would you put on Mahrez? Come on don't be shy put your cards on the table. Surely you are not just another of the happy clappers like Karen and Oakie who think City can and should pay whatever it takes to get whoever they want. Strange that those that are so desperate to belittle the views if others when they quote values mentioned in the media and state they don't think he is worth that money are shit scared of actually putting a figure on what they think he is worth. Pretty poor stuff to be honest.What I cant work out is he keeps going on about price. If he doesnt want him , fine , but he seems to have a mysterious cut off point where he switches from wanting him to not wanting him.
What I cant work out is he keeps going on about price. If he doesnt want him , fine , but he seems to have a mysterious cut off point where he switches from wanting him to not wanting him.
Wrong. i gave you the stats 11 and 6. Best you read my posts before casting judgement.He just uses the price tag as red herring. Thing is that he doesn't rate him nor wants him in the team. As he doesn't really have any numbers or stats or facts for that matter to back-up his aversion, he's using "Leicester's greed" as final resort.