Regarding some of the subsequent discussions in the media, amongst pundits, and fans - I have zero issue with the following or such takes.
That Vinicius Jr is a more 'exciting' player.
That he deserves it more for hsi football.
That his 3 trophies are collectively more significant than Rodri's 4.
That his contribution in those trophies is more significant.
That he is a more influential footballer or person/leader.
Etc.
I don't agree with them, but, they are valid footballing takes that I can respect.
My issue is with the following takes that have been stated or published, that speculate that Rodri won over Vinicius Jr because of:
Racial prejudice.
Dislike of his fight againat racial prejudice.
'Unresolved differences' between Real Madrid and Uefa
'European bias' againat South American players (Messi says hi)
Vote splitting with real madrid teammates that benefited Rodri (which is mathematicallyimpossible).
Punishing him for being outspoken on social issues off the pitch.
Etc.