nmc
Well-Known Member
Sell on clause will apply - we’d just pay less for him than anyone else.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Romeo Lavia
- Thread starter FantasyIreland
- Start date
Sell on clause will apply - we’d just pay less for him than anyone else.
Probably because his buyback is 40m and doesn't come into place until next year.
If we were to try buy him now we'd have to at least match Liverpool bid.
Not sure if you can have a sell on clause to to yourself.
But us bidding £40m is the same as Liverpool bidding £50m.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,600
I assume that our 20% sell on fee will be from the profit that Southampton make on the transfer. They paid £12m up front, so a £50m sale would make us £7.6m extra.But us bidding £40m is the same as Liverpool bidding £50m.
We’d have to offer about £43m to get him back at the same rate this summer.
kun
Well-Known Member
You assume that why?I assume that our 20% sell on fee will be from the profit that Southampton make on the transfer. They paid £12m up front, so a £50m sale would make us £7.6m extra.
We’d have to offer about £43m to get him back at the same rate this summer.
It is unlikely to be a % of profit and much more likely to be a % of total sale (as all of our previous deals have been).
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,600
Assumed it would be. I’ve never seen it one way or the other. Obviously I could be wrong.You assume that why?
It is unlikely to be a % of profit and much more likely to be a % of total sale (as all of our previous deals have been).
Assumed it would be. I’ve never seen it one way or the other. Obviously I could be wrong.
I've seen it reported as % of sale, not profit, if that helps. Most recently with Gvardiol's signing just last week.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,600
Seems mad that if they sold him for less than they got for him that we’d still get £2m if he went for £10m.I've seen it reported as % of sale, not profit, if that helps. Most recently with Gvardiol's signing just last week.
Seems mad that if they sold him for less than they got for him that we’d still get £2m if he went for £10m.
Life's full of little gambles. The other way is clubs pay a higher fee up front and not worry about a sell on. It is effectively a future bonus to reduce the fee, although an unknown one.
That's what I was wondering.But if they are after £50 mill and we have 20% of the sell on fee??
Can you have a sell on clause to yourself?