Romeo Lavia

We sold him for £14mil right, so with the sell on fee we're looking at just £26mil for a then 18 year old with no route to the 1st team

Absolute insane business, also the type of deal that won't show up on transfermarkt etc. For other clubs to bash our net spend

Our club is so well run its insane
 
wolviedinho said:
City are not going to get it right all the time. He didn’t look like a £60m pound player and we have Rodri so maybe Lavia did not want to be backup? Not much we can do about it. We made our decision to transfer Phillips and sell Lavia.


So far that ain’t looking too good.
Click to expand...
Lavia is not the player a lot of people think he is, he’s limited.
 
DMA's said:
This guy isn’t even that good wtf is happening…

so basically Liverpool entered the caicedo race and forced Chelsea to up their offer by 15 mil and now Chelsea entered the lavia race and have forced Liverpool to up their offer by 15 mil.

so if both just stayed out the way of each other they would have saved 15 mil each. desperate clubs doing desperate things
Click to expand...
Its usually what we do to the rags
 
DMA's said:
so basically Liverpool entered the caicedo race and forced Chelsea to up their offer by 15 mil and now Chelsea entered the lavia race and have forced Liverpool to up their offer by 15 mil.

so if both just stayed out the way of each other they would have saved 15 mil each. desperate clubs doing desperate things
Click to expand...
City did it with Rice too. Rivals opting to play lose-lose rather than risk the opponent getting a win. It also stratifies the market, smaller clubs are nowhere near these players. Compounds the effect of FFP.

Newcastle deserve credit for getting Tonali early.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.