johnmc
Well-Known Member
Can you be booked for persistent offside?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Rule question
- Thread starter johnmc
- Start date
frasermcfc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 587
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Re: Rule question
Wouldn't have thought so .....
although with that clown of a referee today i suppose anythin' is possible!
Wouldn't have thought so .....
although with that clown of a referee today i suppose anythin' is possible!
paphos-mcfc
Well-Known Member
Re: Rule question
I know what you're thinking, Edin was a bit keen, unlike Jo and his offside awareness. Sorry!
I know what you're thinking, Edin was a bit keen, unlike Jo and his offside awareness. Sorry!
johnmc
Well-Known Member
Just a general question really.
If you are winning just keeping someone off side and lump it everytime. The ref doesn't stop the watch for offside.
Although he might if it's persistant and blatant.
If you are winning just keeping someone off side and lump it everytime. The ref doesn't stop the watch for offside.
Although he might if it's persistant and blatant.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Re: Rule question
No but i have a question...
I thought that if the ref accidentally got in the way like Mason did today more times than i care to remember, a drop ball was normally the correct course of action?
Of course, each time it benefited Wolves so im obviously talking bollox!
No but i have a question...
I thought that if the ref accidentally got in the way like Mason did today more times than i care to remember, a drop ball was normally the correct course of action?
Of course, each time it benefited Wolves so im obviously talking bollox!
johnmc
Well-Known Member
blueinsa said:No but i have a question...
I thought that if the ref accidentally got in the way like Mason did today more times than i care to remember, a drop ball was normally the correct course of action?
Of course, each time it benefited Wolves so im obviously talking bollox!
You are right there. He did more flicks than a Brazilian winger.
KolarovsLeftPeg
Well-Known Member
Re: Rule question
Anelka would've been suspended all the time for us.
Anelka would've been suspended all the time for us.
a.woollam
Well-Known Member
Re: Rule question
While we're on rules, can you be offside from a goal kick?
While we're on rules, can you be offside from a goal kick?
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Re: Rule question
Wouldn`t say he was often offside !!
But I do remember him reading the fooking newspaper in one game with the oppositions goalie !!!
RyantheBlue said:Anelka would've been suspended all the time for us.
Wouldn`t say he was often offside !!
But I do remember him reading the fooking newspaper in one game with the oppositions goalie !!!