bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Lets just hope if they do any real damage to a nuclear reactor at the time of radiation release the wind is blowing Moscow's way
i have a cunning plan baldrickLets just hope if they do any real damage to a nuclear reactor at the time of radiation release the wind is blowing Moscow's way
"‘Not in your name’: Boris’s Twitter message to Russians goes viral | Evening Standard" https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/boris-johnson-twitter-ukraine-viral-b986034.html?amp
Ignore the man but let's hope the message has reached as many as they say.
i have a cunning plan baldrick
So you agree with the sentiment. But feel you have to insert your view of the Standard/Johnson.Hard to trust when it’s the Standard reporting on Johnson. Agree with the sentiment though
I’m interested in his view. There have been far too many lies from our PM and the press which support him to ever accept stories like this on face value.So you agree with the sentiment. But feel you have to insert your view of the Standard/Johnson.
Got news for you, no one is interested in your view of the Standard/Johnson, they are more concerned with the death and destruction occuring at the moment.
Hard to trust when it’s the Standard reporting on Johnson. Agree with the sentiment though.
So you agree with the sentiment. But feel you have to insert your view of the Standard/Johnson.
Got news for you, no one is interested in your view of the Standard/Johnson, they are more concerned with the death and destruction occuring at the moment.
on what criteria has his view on the standard got anything to do with a thread titled " Russian Invasion of Ukraine"?I’m interested in his view.
I can see where your support of Johnson means you distrust the Standard because its editor is Osborne. However how do you explain the switch to anti-Johnson sentiments in traditional Tory papers like the Mail and the Express?