Russian invasion of Ukraine

these figures likely over-estimated, just as figures Russia published are under-estimated?

They committed 150,000 troops into this conflict in February, they then brought the partial mobilisation where they required 300,000 more. If they weren’t taking huge losses why was there the need to do this? I think the figure is a lot closer to what Ukraine say rather than what those nonces in the Kremlin think it is.
 
They committed 150,000 troops into this conflict in February, they then brought the partial mobilisation where they required 300,000 more. If they weren’t taking huge losses why was there the need to do this? I think the figure is a lot closer to what Ukraine say rather than what those nonces in the Kremlin think it is.
A quarter of a million Russian “troops” injured since February aswell .
 
They committed 150,000 troops into this conflict in February, they then brought the partial mobilisation where they required 300,000 more. If they weren’t taking huge losses why was there the need to do this? I think the figure is a lot closer to what Ukraine say rather than what those nonces in the Kremlin think it is.
This is correct. The people in the Kremlin are nonces.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.