The Belgrano was sunk legitimately.That’s what I mean, we play by the rules and when we don’t there is a backlash
The 'Backlash' was people who decided they didn't want to understand the rules.
The Belgrano was sunk legitimately.That’s what I mean, we play by the rules and when we don’t there is a backlash
Perhaps he had the same coffee as lukashenko ?Putin not been seen in public for a few days apparently.
War is fun isn't it?The Belgrano was sunk legitimately.
The 'Backlash' was people who decided they didn't want to understand the rules.
War is fun isn't it?
The backlash over the Belgrano is that she was sunk whilst outside the exclusion area set up
Just to prove we could...and win an election. Trouble was, you just can't invade a country, no matter if you used to govern, when you feel like it. Junta's are a law unto themselves.Well the Flalklands was rather special, Brittain risking a whole taskforce for the sake of retaking a 1000 sheepherder overseas colony that since has been nothing but a drain ... it's the thought that counts right ;)
Watched a documentary tonight, which suggests it was very nearly a massive fuck up, because certain people thought they knew better than the commander, and that many more were killed and injured than was necessary.Well the Flalklands was rather special, Brittain risking a whole taskforce for the sake of retaking a 1000 sheepherder overseas colony that since has been nothing but a drain ... it's the thought that counts right ;)