Sagna fined 40K for social media post.

[manimanc]

Whilst he's at it bacary should tweet how shite the fa are and how 'le wank' the refs are. If he's going to get done, which is highly likely, then he may as well get done for something at bit more hardcore than 10 against 12. The fa by the way are as corrupt as UEFA and fifa. Sept blatter wouldn't look out of place at the FA.

 

[Hoghead]

I wonder why the FA want an explanation. What do the FA think he was meaning to infer? If they detect this kind of stuff or were informed (most likely), then they must be very sensitive to stuff out of the ordinary, or is it?

 

[inchy14]

Four, starting at West Ham on Friday night.

I thought the FA cup was classed as a separate competition and the league cup counted towards a ban and not the FA?

 

[BlueMoonz1977]

Excellent and well bloody done, players and Pep recognising

 

[MillisleBlue]

So not only are they as bent as a £9 note, but they're also as thick as pig-shit? It's pretty bleedin obvious that Sagna is saying what most of us are thinking. Good luck to him and I hope he has a nice holiday during his 18 months imprisonment and 10 year ban.

 

[Robinho's Subbuteo]

He should just say "Why? Thou protesteth too much moi thinks".

 

[Feed the Elk]

He should say he was referring to the Burnley support as their "twelfth man"

 

[SWP's back]

A ban for an instagram post which can easily be orchestrated as containing ambiguity even if it doesn't

Not a chance.

This. Not a chance of a ban.

 

[SWP's back]

I thought the FA cup was classed as a separate competition and the league cup counted towards a ban and not the FA?

No. Never has. Never will.

 

[Helmet Cole]

This. Not a chance of a ban.

They are probably hoping his explanation contains something ban-worthy.
Maybe he could hedge his bets by saying he can't explain it or he'll get fined/banned?