wesshaw1985 said:any pop at Savic is a pop at Mancini, he picked him
Who else was available? Kompany and Lescott are injured.
wesshaw1985 said:any pop at Savic is a pop at Mancini, he picked him
So; everyone that is blaming him for the goal today is wrong then?MSP said:jimharri said:That's odd. I thought his error was responsible for the Swansea goal which beat us. As for the other players you listed, they can be held responsible (solely or partly) for us not winning the game, but that isn't the same thing.citytill1die84 said:It wasn't his fault we lost what about Clichy,Silva,Nasri,De Jong,Aguero they were also shit.
what error ? He did not made any error, he sent perfectly good ball to the place other player was at the moment of sending.
MSP said:He was no shit. He made one unfortunate mistake that led to conceding a goal. If it could be called a mistake at all, he sent good ball and was just unfortunate that Balotelli (was it he, not sure) decided to move in that millisecond ball went to him.
It's moronic to crucify boy for that, there's ton of such balls in each match
Some of you guys are shame for MCFC, singling out players after each overall awful team performance, and killing their confidence (I'm pretty sure most of them come here to read what fans are saying) is pure bullshit.
RyantheBlue said:Savic played well today, the only people who will say he didn't are people who think one misplaced pass shapes his entire performance.
He made one bad pass, and whilst that led to their possession, we managed to regroup and still conceded. He was solid bar that ONE pass.
jimharri said:So; everyone that is blaming him for the goal today is wrong then?MSP said:jimharri said:That's odd. I thought his error was responsible for the Swansea goal which beat us. As for the other players you listed, they can be held responsible (solely or partly) for us not winning the game, but that isn't the same thing.
what error ? He did not made any error, he sent perfectly good ball to the place other player was at the moment of sending.