El Mago said:I don't know why mid table clubs are not in for him !
El Mago said:I don't know why mid table clubs are not in for him !
Very true, but considering the stated aims and objectives of our 'project' who the fuck was it that thought Sinclair would have been good enough?IanBishopsHaircut said:El Mago said:I don't know why mid table clubs are not in for him !
Agreed..we would have been creaming ourselves signing him pre takeover
He's a decent player..just not a top player
Most of the mid to bottom half of the table would strengthen with his presence
I can only think it's either wages or they are put off by his unsuccessful loan spell
Dribble said:Very true, but considering the stated aims and objectives of our 'project' who the fuck was it that thought Sinclair would have been good enough?IanBishopsHaircut said:El Mago said:I don't know why mid table clubs are not in for him !
Agreed..we would have been creaming ourselves signing him pre takeover
He's a decent player..just not a top player
Most of the mid to bottom half of the table would strengthen with his presence
I can only think it's either wages or they are put off by his unsuccessful loan spell
Sinclair has done nothing wrong, he came here to prove himself good enough for us, but all he proved is that he wasn't. He seems a good lad and I wish him all the best wherever he ends up. His whole 2 year tenure with us has been a waste for his career and a waste of our money and time.
I'm confident the culprit who's finger prints are all over that ill fated window will never be let anywhere near our transfer window decisions again. We'd never had one like it before or since and I know we'll never have one like it again.
It was a painful lesson learned.....
Daz_Blue said:El Mago said:I don't know why mid table clubs are not in for him !
Cheaper option than Di Maria
Just a pity Agent Davey Boy did his job too well too soon. He should have made it a steady but stiff decline not the off the cliff edge descent he made it, that way he could have stayed there long enough so the rot would have set in for a generation. Fuckin gutted...... Ah well :-)Danamy said:Dribble said:Very true, but considering the stated aims and objectives of our 'project' who the fuck was it that thought Sinclair would have been good enough?IanBishopsHaircut said:Agreed..we would have been creaming ourselves signing him pre takeover
He's a decent player..just not a top player
Most of the mid to bottom half of the table would strengthen with his presence
I can only think it's either wages or they are put off by his unsuccessful loan spell
Sinclair has done nothing wrong, he came here to prove himself good enough for us, but all he proved is that he wasn't. He seems a good lad and I wish him all the best wherever he ends up. His whole 2 year tenure with us has been a waste for his career and a waste of our money and time.
I'm confident the culprit who's finger prints are all over that ill fated window will never be let anywhere near our transfer window decisions again. We'd never had one like it before or since and I know we'll never have one like it again.
It was a painful lesson learned.....
It was like putting David Moyes in charge of the Rags........Oh