Scott Sinclair

[The Fat el Hombre]

Why post such nonsense? he was amongst Swansea's best players in the season we signed him,a season in which they were impressive.So,while i agree,it was a mistake to sign him,at least be fair with your criticism......he isn't up to the standard of a top team,however,he certainly isn't shit.

He could do a good job for half a dozen Prem clubs,hopefully one will make an offer.

Didn't do much of a job for west brom. Was always clearly a very primitive player who'd be of no use whatsoever to us or any decent outfit really, regardless of him doing fairly well at swansea (whoop de fucking do).

Did his injury nightmare not resurface at the start of his loan?

And why be so dismissive of his time at Swansea? They are a successful Prem club and a decent barometer of his ability level.

I'm not interested in swansea. I'm interested in him. He's shit

How long was he injured for? How long was his loan?

 

[FantasyIreland]

What are you struggling with?

The fact he isn't good enough for an elite club does not automatically make him 'shit' and neither is it any disgrace.........My point is,he is plenty good enough for half a dozen Prem clubs as his previous period at a decent Prem club proved.

You just sound ignorant and and silly with your remark.

 

[I'm no cynic but...]

Whatever his merits which can be argued over, his career so far represents 'ownership' by four clubs, being Bristol Rovers, Chelsea, Swansea and City. Of these, only at Swansea could it be said that he made a name for himself. The rest of his career has been littered with loan spells at Plymouth, Brummies, Wigan, Baggies, QPR, Charlton and Palace. At the age of 25, his career so far totals eleven clubs of which only City and Chelsea could be considered to be amongst the elite where his appearances were few, and no matter which way it is looked at, his career so far suggests 'journeyman'. Maybe this is a bit harsh but his appearances so far give me little to change my views on him and hopefully a lower status club can snap him up and help him rebuild his career there.

 

[City Glory While Others Fade]

Whatever his merits which can be argued over, his career so far represents 'ownership' by four clubs, being Bristol Rovers, Chelsea, Swansea and City. Of these, only at Swansea could it be said that he made a name for himself. The rest of his career has been littered with loan spells at Plymouth, Brummies, Wigan, Baggies, QPR, Charlton and Palace. At the age of 25, his career so far totals eleven clubs of which only City and Chelsea could be considered to be amongst the elite where his appearances were few, and no matter which way it is looked at, his career so far suggests 'journeyman'. Maybe this is a bit harsh but his appearances so far give me little to change my views on him and hopefully a lower status club can snap him up and help him rebuild his career there.

Fair point well made...feel a bit sorry for Sinclair as it was a mistake by the club...hopefully a lesson learnt and fingers crossed we see him develop somewhere else.

 

[Rammyblues]

Half surprised no one from Scotchland has been after him such as Celtic.

 

[The Fat el Hombre]

What are you struggling with?

The fact he isn't good enough for an elite club does not automatically make him 'shit' and neither is it any disgrace.........My point is,he is plenty good enough for half a dozen Prem clubs as his previous period at a decent Prem club proved.

You just sound ignorant and and silly with your remark.

Yea thanks for that. In my book, he's staying in the shit section

 

[nmc]

Half surprised no one from Scotchland has been after him such as Celtic.

They are.

 

[bluesince76]

Whatever his merits which can be argued over, his career so far represents 'ownership' by four clubs, being Bristol Rovers, Chelsea, Swansea and City. Of these, only at Swansea could it be said that he made a name for himself. The rest of his career has been littered with loan spells at Plymouth, Brummies, Wigan, Baggies, QPR, Charlton and Palace. At the age of 25, his career so far totals eleven clubs of which only City and Chelsea could be considered to be amongst the elite where his appearances were few, and no matter which way it is looked at, his career so far suggests 'journeyman'. Maybe this is a bit harsh but his appearances so far give me little to change my views on him and hopefully a lower status club can snap him up and help him rebuild his career there.

You could say the same for SWP.

He's not good enough to get regular games for us or even to challenge Navas for a place on the bench. However, he is good enough to play for most sides outside the top 6, however I suspect his top 4 wages are the stumbling block.

Like Richards, he needs to decide what's most important - an extra £20k a week or playing regular football. We gave him the contract, so I don't blame him for choosing the money, but I wonder if they grew up dreaming of being rich(er) or of being a football player?

 

[mrtwiceaseason]

The girl on sky sports said that Swansea or in the market for a winger today .seems to fit ?

 

[Mancitybluemoon1]

ty Watch ‏@City_Watch 3m
Stoke are trying to thrash out a deal with City to sign Scott Sinclair today. (via @MOgdenTelegraph)