gouldybob
Well-Known Member
The last Danny Mills or Winston Bogarde, a waste of space, but enjoy the cash
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Scott Sinclair
- Thread starter drthingy
- Start date
salfordbluetrue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jul 2013
- Messages
- 4,010
lets just go back to before we bought sinclair , he was a quick young english player with potential to play in a position we had no one , a lot of other teams were looking at him but we got him for peanuts when compared to other english players we pay him peanuts when compared to the others . a director bought this player and a churlish manager took the piss out of him exactly how many minutes are you lot basing your opinions of him on is he not even good enough for the lower divisions as we have played plenty of them. yes we can do better which is the reason he should go and we can expect most of the fee we spent as every team in the lower half of the table and all the promoted will want a player with potential and they will look at it as citys failure to get the best out of players which will effect all future buys. as for sacking people we did sinclair was the main reason we sacked mancini so some good came out of it.maybe he was worth it after all?
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
salfordbluetrue said:lets just go back to before we bought sinclair , he was a quick young english player with potential to play in a position we had no one , a lot of other teams were looking at him but we got him for peanuts when compared to other english players we pay him peanuts when compared to the others . a director bought this player and a churlish manager took the piss out of him exactly how many minutes are you lot basing your opinions of him on is he not even good enough for the lower divisions as we have played plenty of them. yes we can do better which is the reason he should go and we can expect most of the fee we spent as every team in the lower half of the table and all the promoted will want a player with potential and they will look at it as citys failure to get the best out of players which will effect all future buys. as for sacking people we did sinclair was the main reason we sacked mancini so some good came out of it.maybe he was worth it after all?
You mean a team like WBA?
You might need a re-think there. He's gone backwards in my opinion.
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.soccernews.com/southampton-eyeing-sinclair-move/146079/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.soccernews.com/southampton-e ... ve/146079/</a>
Southampton are considering a move for out-of-favour Manchester City winger Scott Sinclair, according to the Telegraph.
Despite uncertainty surrounding the future of manager Mauricio Pochettino, the south coast club are keen to assemble a list of potential transfer targets for the forthcoming campaign.
He moved to the Etihad Stadium from Swansea City in the summer of 2012, but made just two starts for the club in his first season, before moving to West Bromwich Albion on a year-long loan last August.
Despite the Manchester club’s need to fill a quota of home-grown players, Sinclair is one of many English players to be linked with a transfer away in the close season.
----------------------------------------------
Along with the West Brom loan fee,i don't think we'll lose much on him,all extra on the 49....
Southampton are considering a move for out-of-favour Manchester City winger Scott Sinclair, according to the Telegraph.
Despite uncertainty surrounding the future of manager Mauricio Pochettino, the south coast club are keen to assemble a list of potential transfer targets for the forthcoming campaign.
He moved to the Etihad Stadium from Swansea City in the summer of 2012, but made just two starts for the club in his first season, before moving to West Bromwich Albion on a year-long loan last August.
Despite the Manchester club’s need to fill a quota of home-grown players, Sinclair is one of many English players to be linked with a transfer away in the close season.
----------------------------------------------
Along with the West Brom loan fee,i don't think we'll lose much on him,all extra on the 49....
Barcon
Well-Known Member
salfordbluetrue said:lets just go back to before we bought sinclair , he was a quick young english player with potential to play in a position we had no one , a lot of other teams were looking at him but we got him for peanuts when compared to other english players we pay him peanuts when compared to the others . a director bought this player and a churlish manager took the piss out of him exactly how many minutes are you lot basing your opinions of him on is he not even good enough for the lower divisions as we have played plenty of them. yes we can do better which is the reason he should go and we can expect most of the fee we spent as every team in the lower half of the table and all the promoted will want a player with potential and they will look at it as citys failure to get the best out of players which will effect all future buys. as for sacking people we did sinclair was the main reason we sacked mancini so some good came out of it.maybe he was worth it after all?
Go on then, let's hear it.
Rammyblues
Well-Known Member
FFS he is a great winger, lots of pace and trickery and in other circumstances he might have made it at city. If Southampton want to pay 15m for his services they have a bargain player IMO. He will certainly fit in nicely down south. :-)
citytill1die84
Well-Known Member
Rammyblues said:FFS he is a great winger, lots of pace and trickery and in other circumstances he might have made it at city. If Southampton want to pay 15m for his services they have a bargain player IMO. He will certainly fit in nicely down south. :-)
15m? Not a chance more like 1.5m
Barcon
Well-Known Member
citytill1die84 said:Rammyblues said:FFS he is a great winger, lots of pace and trickery and in other circumstances he might have made it at city. If Southampton want to pay 15m for his services they have a bargain player IMO. He will certainly fit in nicely down south. :-)
15m? Not a chance more like 1.5m
18?