Didsbury Dave said:
I remember, Gary. They started giving us 6000 standing at the Scoreboard End, then maybe even less. We were still giving them 7000 in the Platt Lane and 6000 in the Kippax.
When it went all seated wasn't there a derby in the 90s when we got no tickets, when OT was being constructed? Or is my memory playing up?
As an aside, I rememer going to Anfield in the 90s when the Kop was being rebuilt and we were given about 300 tickets. In the event, they opened the Kop that night.
You're spot on with all of this. The thing was that the capacity of OT even with the building work was still bigger than most grounds and so we should have had at least a couple of thousand tickets.
The City of the late 80s/early 90s wanted to fill the ground no matter what and so they were very happy to let 13k utd in if it meant it was full. It used to really annoy me. In my mind if the two grounds were similar in size (OK Ot was a bigger capacity) then they should give the same allocation, but they always claimed there'd be issues with segregation. Yet, City had to sort out segregation.
I remember how disappointed we felt when it was decided in the mid 80s the old Platt Lane would be given to away fans because of orders from the council/police. Whether this was true or not I don't know, but that suddenly meant a 9,000 seater stand was only for away fans, plus we decided we wanted to give all opponents the option of terracing in the Kippax corner. Often teams like Wimbledon would arrive at Maine Road with a couple of hundred sat in the Platt Lane. It was crazy, but we had to do it.
United possibly had a better relationship with their council/police, but it just seemed wrong and City could have sorted it back then but chose to take the guaranteed away fans' money instead. Why didn't the Club look at splitting the Platt Lane (difficult but not impossible) or only give them the Platt Lane and no terracing or vice-versa?