Shauny turns down new contract

stonerblue said:
california blue said:
How about one of the these to replace him

Di Maria
Krasic
Elia

Yes please

how about we show some support and respect to a player who will run himself into the ground for City.

I dont think anybody here hs an issue with Tevez.
 
robbieh said:
Corky said:
If that is true then that is a disgrace spreading stuff like this.

No one accpets the first offer, it could be playing for nowt.

Could come back to bite us if he is forced out with Barca or Arsenal


Barca or Arsenal? You cannot be serious. Theres is no way he is anything like good enough for either of these teams?

I think Shaun is much better at defending and tackling than De Jong is going forward.

If he went it would be someone like Villa, as O´Neill likes British/Irish players. But Chelsea/Utd and even Liverpool wouldn´t take him.

And I am a fan. Just a realistic one when it comes to valuing our players. We do have some great players ie Kompany, Tevez, Adebayor, de Jong, Bellamy but sadly Shaun and Stevie are a notch down from these guys.
 
You can see his point when you look at the salaries the likes of Santa Cruz and Toure are getting.

Get it sorted City, Shaun is a Blue who gives everything for the club...

The Guardian
Shaun Wright-Phillips turns down new Manchester City contract
• Winger has seen new arrivals receive bigger salaries
• Manchester City are unwilling to meet his wage demands

Roberto Mancini's problems with his Manchester City players have extended to Shaun Wright-Phillips after the England international turned down a new contract because he felt he was not being offered enough money, a development that has left the winger starting to begrudge the men in power at Eastlands.

Wright-Phillips, 28, will have two years to run on his £60,000-a-week contract at the end of the season but that deal was signed a few weeks before the Abu Dhabi United Group's takeover established a new pay ceiling at the club. This will be the last major contract of Wright-Phillips's career and he wants to take advantage of the immense riches available to the club by moving closer to the higher earners such as Emmanuel Adebayor, Kolo Touré and Carlos Tevez, all of whom earn in excess of £100,000 a week.

City have responded by telling him they have no intention of increasing his pay so significantly, on the basis he will be 30 when his contract expires, an age that counts against any player who relies so heavily on pace. There is also a disparity between the length of deal the player is craving and what the club's chief executive, Garry Cook, and football administrator, Brian Marwood, are willing to offer.

That has left the Wright-Phillips camp complaining that the City hierarchy seem more interested in rewarding new signings rather than players who have a genuine affinity with the club. Since Wright-Phillips rejoined City from Chelsea 18 months ago he has seen players such as Wayne Bridge, with a weekly salary of £90,000, join on higher wages and is said not to feel "appreciated". In that time he has earned in excess of £4.5m.

Mancini has not been involved in the negotiations but the dispute can be added to a number of problems for the City manager, ranging from Patrick Vieira's poor form and discipline to the much-publicised argument with Craig Bellamy and growing concerns about Stephen Ireland's level of performance.

After winning his first four games Mancini's management style has come into question with only two wins from seven games going into tomorrow's FA Cup fifth-round replay at Stoke City, and the Italian is acutely aware that his team's last hope of silverware is in jeopardy.

"Mentally the players must be strong," he said. "We must try to play football when we can but if that is not possible we must play the ball in the air and jump and fight for every ball and concentrate at set pieces."

Tevez has been in Argentina for 10 days after the premature birth of his daughter and will not be involved against Stoke, but Mancini said the club's leading scorer would be back in time to play Chelsea on Saturday. "He had a serious problem but now I think he has resolved this problem and it's important that he comes back."
 
No quotes from SWP it's just arsewipe Guardian bullshit, just another example of the rag-controlled media doing all it can to destabilise us, they all hate us, the top-four loving cocksuckers; bastards, and all this coming out just four weeks before a month on Wednesday... bastards.

Nurse... the screens.
 
Kinky by name said:
No quotes from SWP it's just arsewipe Guardian bullshit, just another example of the rag-controlled media doing all it can to destabilise us, they all hate us, the top-four loving cocksuckers; bastards, and all this coming out just four weeks before a month on Wednesday... bastards.

Nurse... the screens.

sound about right to me kinky [the swp story in the guardian, not your need for a nurse and screens]. his old man was moaning about the sam epoints not too long ago. or am i missing something?
 
warpig said:
Kinky by name said:
No quotes from SWP it's just arsewipe Guardian bullshit, just another example of the rag-controlled media doing all it can to destabilise us, they all hate us, the top-four loving cocksuckers; bastards, and all this coming out just four weeks before a month on Wednesday... bastards.

Nurse... the screens.

sound about right to me kinky [the swp story in the guardian, not your need for a nurse and screens]. his old man was moaning about the sam epoints not too long ago. or am i missing something?


No warpig mate, of course it's (about) right; I was just being a bit sarcy re some of the OTT paranoid responses to reports we have on here.
 
Kinky by name said:
warpig said:
sound about right to me kinky [the swp story in the guardian, not your need for a nurse and screens]. his old man was moaning about the sam epoints not too long ago. or am i missing something?


No warpig mate, of course it's (about) right; I was just being a bit sarcy re some of the OTT paranoid responses to reports we have on here.

does that mean ive had one them clarkie things done to me? my life is complete if so. anyway, put one of them smiley face thingys on the end next time you do anything with a hint of sarcasim. it avoids idiots like me from getting confused.

but like this...

;)

or this...

;-)
 
warpig said:
Kinky by name said:
No warpig mate, of course it's (about) right; I was just being a bit sarcy re some of the OTT paranoid responses to reports we have on here.

does that mean ive had one them clarkie things done to me? my life is complete if so. anyway, put one of them smiley face thingys on the end next time you do anything with a hint of sarcasim. it avoids idiots like me from getting confused.

but like this...

;)

or this...

;-)


;P
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.