grim up north
Well-Known Member
Or notNo reason to change Stones and Diaz partnership. Taking Stones out could damage to the team, and to his performances in the future.
Or notNo reason to change Stones and Diaz partnership. Taking Stones out could damage to the team, and to his performances in the future.
Sorry, for me the weak link in that side, otherwise very good team.He was in the best form of his City career and one of the best players in the team across all those games we were struggling in the first part of the season.
We were wondering if Cancelo wouldn’t get in the team at right back until Walker retires around November time.
Walker is a quality player.
Scored against these last time out.
Are you not depressed enough :-) it’s my lockdown form of self harmhahaha looking forward to match day thread
No reason to change Stones and Diaz partnership. Taking Stones out could damage to the team, and to his performances in the future.
No reason to change Stones and Diaz partnership. Taking Stones out could damage to the team, and to his performances in the future.
Stop posting you mouth breathing house brick.Yes. We are best Defence of the league with him on the left. But this is not good enough for Pep. We will change his position and his partner.
Or he could have underperformed in training and Laporte could have been better? Or Laporte is gonna be needed next month with fixtures pilling up so now would be a good time to get some game time. Or Stones could just need a rest. Who knows but Laporte is more than good enoughNo reason to change Stones and Diaz partnership. Taking Stones out could damage to the team, and to his performances in the future.
Dont say that. You could be called clown.No reason to change Stones and Diaz partnership. Taking Stones out could damage to the team, and to his performances in the future.