Simple Question: Do you trust our owner?

[crystal_mais]

YES

 

[Blu1]

Yes

 

[SatOnTheWall]

Until I hear what they have got to say for themselves, probably, just about yes. Everyone deserves to have their say but it had better be fucking good.

After that, well, it depends, doesn't it?

 

[Blue Til Death]

It’s a Yes from me..

 

[blueparrot]

Yes.

 

[u2fme2]

Yes but not on this issue regarding breakaway

 

[Craig]

No

 

[Franknorgrovesnephew]

YES

 

[jrb]

No.

Mansour, Khaldoon and 'Soriano' all have very short memories.

The 3 of them have sided with the Glazers/United, Henry/FSG/Liverpool, Kroneke/Arsenal, Levy/Spurs.(and Chelsea)

They very people and clubs that have been trying to destroy City for the last 10 years

F*** off, you money grabbing, 2 faced, c*nts!

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

Yes. And I think they'll come out and say we're not joining this shit

 

[Gordyola]

No.

Mansour, Khaldoon and 'Soriano' all have very short memories.

The 3 of them have sided with the Glazers/United, Henry/FSG/Liverpool, Kroneke/Arsenal, Levy/Spurs.(and Chelsea)

They very people and clubs that have been trying to destroy City for the last 10 years

F*** off, you money grabbing, 2 faced, c*nts!

Or they could side with the others who signed the letter

 

[pirate]

trusted them until this european superleague bollocks.

i now do not. if they come up with a good argument as to why they have done this i will trust them again.
the problem is i cannot see any good argument they could make

 

[radcliffe1309]

We need an explanation now from the Chairman and a detailed one at that, only then can I form an opinion and give an answer to the question "do I trust our owner" I need a lot of convincing and so do thousands more !

Come on Kaldoon

 

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

When they had firing squads back in the day they used to leave one gun without a bullet so each gunman could tell themselves it wasn't me that done it.

On the other hand, Sheikh Mansour has invested heavily in our club - at a time when investment in world football is usually a losing financial proposition.

For me, our owner is investing in Manchester City because he loves world football and he thinks that our club is the best investment he can make to advance the sport.

Were Sheikh Mansour simply interested in making as much money as he could - I fail to see why he'd invest in any football club.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

Up until this point yes. But currently its a no. I dont understand how this is going to benefit the fans.

 

[TheThirdDeano]

To always do what’s best for the fans? No
To always do what’s best to ensure the survivability of Manchester city? Yes

 

[Bill Walker]

Yes.

 

[EL APACHE TEVEZ]

No

 

[Gundog’s Gundog]

trusted them until this european superleague bollocks.

i now do not. if they come up with a good argument as to why they have done this i will trust them again.
the problem is i cannot see any good argument they could make

How about because it’s more lucrative, stops us potentially being left behind and breaks UEFA’s corrupt stranglehold on European football.

All this wailing and crying by fans before any real details have been revealed is ridiculous. As things stand we might possibly have a few more euro games than we would’ve had in the expanded CL. Nothing else is set to change, we are still fully committed to fulfilling the domestic program.

 

[super_city_si]

Yes of course