Sky claim to have an exclusive (May/May Not be City related)

[Pigeonho]

Bot odd, the 'Sky reporter wouldn't get excited at City news', part of the OP.

Martin Tyler was buzzing at the prospect of Isco coming to the PL with us last night when he was commentating. I would imagine that Sky reporter's would also be buzzing at such a transfer, because it means they get to report on the current player everyone is talking about coming to an English club.

Give it a rest for fucks sake mate. Surely you get bored repeating it. You won't change their mind! You know this.

I can't help it! Imagine being that negative in the way you see things that you instantly have to add something like 'Sky won't get excited about anything to do with City'?! There's no reason they wouldn't get excited if we signed Isco, because it would give them the yellow ticker, a shot outside Carrington and for White to get his hyper-active presenting style out!

 

[markbmcfc]

Whoa hang on a minute.

In the OP, I meant I couldn't see a Sky reporter having his heart racing on a story regarding City at this moment. Isco for example whilst very exciting for us, and no doubt exciting for the media to report on, we all know it isn't on the publicity level as Ronaldo/Rooney/Bale etc at this moment in time.

Any denial of that is just plain wrong and rather deluded.

Just clearing that up before I'm labelled part of the agenda brigade.

 

[Pigeonho]

Whoa hang on a minute.

In the OP, I meant I couldn't see a Sky reporter having his heart racing on a story regarding City at this moment. Isco for example whilst very exciting for us, and no doubt exciting for the media to report on, we all know it isn't on the publicity level as Ronaldo/Rooney/Bale etc at this moment in time.

Any denial of that is just plain wrong and rather deluded.

Just clearing that up before I'm labelled part of the agenda brigade.

What if it was Ronaldo to us? Would the reporter's ticker be racing then?

 

[whipper]

Whoa hang on a minute.

In the OP, I meant I couldn't see a Sky reporter having his heart racing on a story regarding City at this moment. Isco for example whilst very exciting for us, and no doubt exciting for the media to report on, we all know it isn't on the publicity level as Ronaldo/Rooney/Bale etc at this moment in time.

Any denial of that is just plain wrong and rather deluded.

Just clearing that up before I'm labelled part of the agenda brigade.

What if it was Ronaldo to us? Would the reporter's ticker be racing then?

If it was Rooney or Ronaldo sky wouldn't have an exclusive on it.It would be all over the papers by now.

I think it will be either Cavani or Isco,which have both been in the press for a fair while.

So I'd say either Isco to us or Cavani to Chelsea.

 

[AntiUnited]

IF isco comes here = champs already simple as that kun and dzeko striking up GG GL HF

 

[markbmcfc]

Whoa hang on a minute.

In the OP, I meant I couldn't see a Sky reporter having his heart racing on a story regarding City at this moment. Isco for example whilst very exciting for us, and no doubt exciting for the media to report on, we all know it isn't on the publicity level as Ronaldo/Rooney/Bale etc at this moment in time.

Any denial of that is just plain wrong and rather deluded.

Just clearing that up before I'm labelled part of the agenda brigade.

What if it was Ronaldo to us? Would the reporter's ticker be racing then?

Of course it would.

That's not going to happen though, is it? So that wasn't really on the mind when I made the statement.

Surely, I shouldn't have to quantify a gentle remark with very little thought, very late at night, so that I can't be considered part of the agenda brigade? Isn't that having an agenda about the agenda?!

A reverse agenda brigade, only on bluemoon!

 

[Pigeonho]

Whoa hang on a minute.

In the OP, I meant I couldn't see a Sky reporter having his heart racing on a story regarding City at this moment. Isco for example whilst very exciting for us, and no doubt exciting for the media to report on, we all know it isn't on the publicity level as Ronaldo/Rooney/Bale etc at this moment in time.

Any denial of that is just plain wrong and rather deluded.

Just clearing that up before I'm labelled part of the agenda brigade.

What if it was Ronaldo to us? Would the reporter's ticker be racing then?

Of course it would.

That's not going to happen though, is it? So that wasn't really on the mind when I made the statement.

Surely, I shouldn't have to quantify a gentle remark with very little thought, very late at night, so that I can't be considered part of the agenda brigade? Isn't that having an agenda about the agenda?!

A reverse agenda brigade, only on bluemoon!

I fucking love the agenda, let alone the reverse agenda!

 

[Graceyboy]

What if it was Ronaldo to us? Would the reporter's ticker be racing then?

Of course it would.

That's not going to happen though, is it? So that wasn't really on the mind when I made the statement.

Surely, I shouldn't have to quantify a gentle remark with very little thought, very late at night, so that I can't be considered part of the agenda brigade? Isn't that having an agenda about the agenda?!

A reverse agenda brigade, only on bluemoon!

I fucking love the agenda, let alone the reverse agenda!

I'll see your "Reverse Agenda" and raise it with a "Double Bluff Reverse Agenda"

 

[MCFC61]

This was posted hours ago so where's the effin exclusive.?

 

[yerwot?]

Of course it would.

That's not going to happen though, is it? So that wasn't really on the mind when I made the statement.

Surely, I shouldn't have to quantify a gentle remark with very little thought, very late at night, so that I can't be considered part of the agenda brigade? Isn't that having an agenda about the agenda?!

A reverse agenda brigade, only on bluemoon!

I fucking love the agenda, let alone the reverse agenda!

I'll see your "Reverse Agenda" and raise it with a "Double Bluff Reverse Agenda"

double-bluff is counter-productive it has to be triple or single, other wise it gets confusing :)