Slap Neil Ashton

Newsworthy? I'd say so, imagine one of the cars crashing and a City player getting injured and it turns out the vehicle wasn't correctly insured and the business was part-owned by the City captain!

Sorry but if Vinny's creaming off profits from the business then as a director he has as much responsibility as the other co-owners to make sure it's being run properly.
 
Halfpenny said:
He makes it seem like Kompany is the main owner of the business and that he's somehow implicated in all of this. Very poor piece.

He's a news of the screws scum bag, who may well find himself in the dock at some point as the investigation gathers pace. He might find a letter on his desk from Carter Ruck, asking for a retraction. The man a gollum eared waste of space, yet another "Football" journalist, just waiting for his balls to be kicked into his crainium.
 
He labels this as an exclusive even though it appeared on the front page of the MEN on Saturday.
The Mail have a corrections section where they print what they have got wrong. I am emailing them as this is not an exclusive, lets see if they print a correction.
The email address is corrections@dailymail.co.uk, I think a few people need to send in that it is not an exlusive, because as usual this idiot is trying to put City down.
 
Blue Pimp said:
He labels this as an exclusive even though it appeared on the front page of the MEN on Saturday.
The Mail have a corrections section where they print what they have got wrong. I am emailing them as this is not an exclusive, lets see if they print a correction.
The email address is corrections@dailymail.co.uk, I think a few people need to send in that it is not an exlusive, because as usual this idiot is trying to put City down.


Email sent
 
The gutless Daily Mail closed down the comment section for that story as blues were laying into that worm Ashton who is behind many of these well timed anti-City stories.
 
You guys are weird; there is literally not a single thing wrong with that article.

It's newsworthy, it isn't hyperbolic and it's fairly written.

You're all becoming like rags with their "ABU" shite.
 
probably a driver with an out-of-date licence,therefore the vehicle, in the eyes of the insurance company is uninsured;the implication of the article that VK is party to running a scam on insurance is undeniable.
 
bellbuzzer said:
probably a driver with an out-of-date licence,therefore the vehicle, in the eyes of the insurance company is uninsured;the implication of the article that VK is party to running a scam on insurance is undeniable.

I'm denying it, show me where this implication has been made.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.