gaudinho's stolen car
Well-Known Member
JoeMercer'sWay said:that Graham Chapman was a bit of an arse in all honesty.
Alcoholics often are.
JoeMercer'sWay said:that Graham Chapman was a bit of an arse in all honesty.
Someone else who gets thing wrong.Second Skin said:Pride_In_Battle said:Second Skin said:If you divide 22 by 7 you get pi.
Are you markt85 by any chance?
No, who is markt85?
SWP's back said:Someone else who gets thing wrong.Second Skin said:Pride_In_Battle said:Are you markt85 by any chance?
No, who is markt85?
22/7 is not pi
BoyBlue_1985 said:SWP's back said:Someone else who gets thing wrong.Second Skin said:No, who is markt85?
22/7 is not pi
In fairness rounded down to 2 decimal points it is but in total it is completely wrong
Proofs of the famous mathematical result that the rational number 22/7 is greater than π (pi) date back to antiquity. One of these proofs, more recently developed but requiring only elementary techniques from calculus, has attracted attention in modern mathematics due to its mathematical elegance and its connections to the theory of diophantine approximations. Stephen Lucas calls this proof, "One of the more beautiful results related to approximating π". Julian Havil ends a discussion of continued fraction approximations of π with the result, describing it as "impossible to resist mentioning" in that context.
The purpose of the proof is not primarily to convince its readers that 22/7 (or 31⁄7) is indeed bigger than π; systematic methods of computing the value of π exist. If one knows that π is approximately 3.14159, then it trivially follows that π < 22/7, which is approximately 3.142857. But it takes much less work to show that π < 22/7 by the method used in this proof than to show that π is approximately 3.14159.
gaudinho's stolen car said:BoyBlue_1985 said:SWP's back said:Someone else who gets thing wrong.
22/7 is not pi
In fairness rounded down to 2 decimal points it is but in total it is completely wrong
This reminds me of that 0.9r equalling 1.
Proofs of the famous mathematical result that the rational number 22/7 is greater than π (pi) date back to antiquity. One of these proofs, more recently developed but requiring only elementary techniques from calculus, has attracted attention in modern mathematics due to its mathematical elegance and its connections to the theory of diophantine approximations. Stephen Lucas calls this proof, "One of the more beautiful results related to approximating π". Julian Havil ends a discussion of continued fraction approximations of π with the result, describing it as "impossible to resist mentioning" in that context.
The purpose of the proof is not primarily to convince its readers that 22/7 (or 31⁄7) is indeed bigger than π; systematic methods of computing the value of π exist. If one knows that π is approximately 3.14159, then it trivially follows that π < 22/7, which is approximately 3.142857. But it takes much less work to show that π < 22/7 by the method used in this proof than to show that π is approximately 3.14159.
BoyBlue_1985 said:SWP's back said:Someone else who gets thing wrong.Second Skin said:No, who is markt85?
22/7 is not pi
In fairness rounded down to 2 decimal points it is but in total it is completely wrong
SWP's back said:BoyBlue_1985 said:SWP's back said:Someone else who gets thing wrong.
22/7 is not pi
In fairness rounded down to 2 decimal points it is but in total it is completely wrong
Thats like saying that "car" and "carbon" are the same thing as they start with the same three letters.
22/7 is not pi.
It is similar but not the same.
Lucky13 said:That the internet is full of hard cunts.