Blue Mooner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Jun 2005
- Messages
- 3,139
Im not saying the rules are different but they are interpreted differently (wrongly but all the time) when a keeper is involved.
The ref that gave the feedback on the highlights i just saw also said that the ref had to be sure to give a penalty and if he wasn't then it was the right decision not to give a penalty (even though his point of view having watched the video numerous times was that it was a penalty). He said it was a "grey one" (i.e. very difficult to decide) and therefore the ref was right not to give it as it wasn't clear cut.
The players reaction says it all to me....Sane says it wasn't a penalty nor did he appeal at the time.
The goal keeper gets a touch (that is undeniable) but he cant exactly then suddenly get out of the way/he cant disappear so there is going to be contact but that comes after the ball has been touched.
I not believe the Clichy one was a penalty either just so you know
What planet are you on..?
The players reaction says it wasn't a penalty!!? How about, Peps reaction, how about the fact Otamendi got booked after the incident, how about the fact are players are forced into compliance by post match fines for the club for 'failing to control our players!?'
That is as nailed on a penalty as you will possibly see.I thought it at the time, pep thought so and I have seen nothing since to change my mind. I have also seen nothing compelling that tells me Forster got even the slightest touch on the ball.
I guarantee in a few weeks we will see similar incidents where a penalty will be awarded inspite of the fact the keeper gets a touch on the ball.