space questions

casualdeyna said:
Once interesting thing I have seen recently is that some scientists believe the Universe is circular and what is outside of this circle "doesn't exist" (until the expanding universe enters it) so if you could travel to the edge of the Universe and step across would you come out at a corresponding place at the opposite side of the Universe, so like a computer game when you go off the edge of the screen you come back on opposite side. If this is true presumably if you had a powerful enough telescope you could look at the back of your own head! (but have to wait billions of years due to spacetime!!)

The Universe is flat and due to that is probably infinite in all directions:

<a class="postlink" href="http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html</a>

Bill Bryson short history of nearly everything is a must read if this kind of thing interests you, don't be put off by its size it is an amazing read and what got me in to it. I believe I have a decent grasp on things but still can't get my head round quantum mechanics at all as essentially gravity doesn't exist, it's what this search for the Higgs Boson and particle accelerators are all about.

I have to say that I was disappointed with this because the information is now so out of date that it teaches some poor and misleading stuff.

Also as I said in a post earlier, gravity is the name that we give to the effect that we see when spacetime is curved. You can argue that it is a force or it isn't a force (I'm in the earlier camp) though the existence of it is pretty well established.

Also an electron, that "orbits" a neutron and proton, can exist everywhere at once and nowhere at the same time?!? Best way to explain is basically it is that "fast" if you were to "watch" it, it would seem instead of it travelling in a path it just disappears and reappears somewhere else. So "fast" if you were to take pictures on some pictures there would be more than one electron (even though it is the same electron) and in other pictures none at all. Partical physics is a very mind bending science!!

You've melded a couple of different things together here as far as I can see. The thing about existing everything at once and nowhere at once all at the same time was known as the electron cloud, which meant that it had a probability of existing at all possible places at once. This is now outdated and quantum field theory is a more suited explanation. This is a good video for QFT

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEKSpZPByD0[/video]
 
couple of questions for the braniacs here

1. If most living things were wiped out with the meteor hitting earth, what did Humans evolve from ? what was left that gave rise to us ?

2. i was walking the dog through the woods the other day and looking at all the rotting leaves on the ground, and thought would the earth keep getting bigger with all this vegetation over millions of years ? as it is new matter and not reused ?
 
Never heard gravity described that way before Damocles. So I can assume the universe acts like a big sheet of tarpaulin and the planets are as you say, weights causing some areas more easily to fall into than others depending on their mass? Makes it so easy to imagine.

I will be checkin out that book casualdeyna. I have always been interested in this stuff, but I have recently decided that I want to understand properly how things work before I expire.
 
mekonmcfc said:
couple of questions for the braniacs here

1. If most living things were wiped out with the meteor hitting earth, what did Humans evolve from ? what was left that gave rise to us ?

2. i was walking the dog through the woods the other day and looking at all the rotting leaves on the ground, and thought would the earth keep getting bigger with all this vegetation over millions of years ? as it is new matter and not reused ?

The little rock pools filled with amino acids that heated up and were (as one theory suggests) catalyzed by lightning and we think we developed in this manor (that is a very basic example though). Comets and asteroids will have hit after the earth cooled and calmed again thus delivering the basic ingredients.
Small mammals also survived these ele's underground so we could equally have come from them.
Advanced life may have been stalled a few times in this manor.

This vegetation just rots and gets reabsorbed by the tree which will eventually get cut or burned etc etc.
It is just energy transforming from one form to another. The tree has potential energy in the form of heat for example if you burned it.
The oil we burn is just very old leaves and dead stuff again getting transformed. It is just a big cycle really bud using the same stuff.
 
mekonmcfc said:
couple of questions for the braniacs here

1. If most living things were wiped out with the meteor hitting earth, what did Humans evolve from ? what was left that gave rise to us ?

2. i was walking the dog through the woods the other day and looking at all the rotting leaves on the ground, and thought would the earth keep getting bigger with all this vegetation over millions of years ? as it is new matter and not reused ?
No, because it goes back into the earth and continues to be part of the cycle, e.g. providing nutrients for plant matter to grow and later being consumed.
 
mekonmcfc said:
couple of questions for the braniacs here

1. If most living things were wiped out with the meteor hitting earth, what did Humans evolve from ? what was left that gave rise to us ?

Mammals at this point suffered losses but not extinction. Things like marsupials outside of Australia are a good example. The mammals that eventually became humans would have lived underground at this point like moles and others.

Many believe that without that extinction event humans couldn't exist now as there were too many predators for us to have evolved in the same way before

2. i was walking the dog through the woods the other day and looking at all the rotting leaves on the ground, and thought would the earth keep getting bigger with all this vegetation over millions of years ? as it is new matter and not reused ?

It decays into the ground and gets crushed by layers above it. As it gets more stuff on top of it, it creates more and more pressure. This is where oil comes from.
 
TCIB said:
mekonmcfc said:
couple of questions for the braniacs here

1. If most living things were wiped out with the meteor hitting earth, what did Humans evolve from ? what was left that gave rise to us ?

2. i was walking the dog through the woods the other day and looking at all the rotting leaves on the ground, and thought would the earth keep getting bigger with all this vegetation over millions of years ? as it is new matter and not reused ?

The little rock pools filled with amino acids that heated up and were (as one theory suggests) catalyzed by lightning and we think we developed in this manor (that is a very basic example though). Comets and asteroids will have hit after the earth cooled and calmed again thus delivering the basic ingredients.
Small mammals also survived these ele's underground so we could equally have come from them.
Advanced life may have been stalled a few times in this manor.

This vegetation just rots and gets reabsorbed by the tree which will eventually get cut or burned etc etc.
It is just energy transforming from one form to another. The tree has potential energy in the form of heat for example if you burned it.
The oil we burn is just very old leaves and dead stuff again getting transformed. It is just a big cycle really bud using the same stuff.


its crazy though that dinosaurs took 100's of millions of years to evolve and humans around 7 million. Always intrigued by this stuff
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.